ArticleiScience2024
Sex disparities in the risk of urgent dialysis following acute aortic dissections in Japan.
Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global outcome of acute aortic dissection (AD) remains poor, with a high risk of the need for urgent dialysis. This study aimed to clarify the association between sex and the requirement for urgent dialysis within 30 days after admission among patients with AD. This study included 79,998 cases who were hospitalized due to AD in Japan from 2010 to 2020 using an administrative claims database. The association between the risk of urgent dialysis and sex was investigated using the Fine and Gray model. Patients were classified into two groups based on the Stanford classification: type A AD (TAAD) and type B AD (TBAD). The lower subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) in women was observed in both groups: TAAD (SHR: 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54-0.62); TBAD (SHR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.41-0.58). Our study revealed that women had a lower risk of requiring urgent dialysis than men in TAAD and TBAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.