Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39211520›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

Results from a phase I study of 4-

Josef Pichler, Tatjana Traub-Weidinger, Kurt Spiegl, Larisa Imamovic, Arthur J A T Braat, Tom J Snijders, Joost J C Verhoeff, Patrick Flamen, Libuse Tauchmanova, Colin Hayward and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Antitumor efficacy and safety of locoregional [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Near complete response recurrent glioblastoma after treatment with [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  7. The molecular blueprint of targeted radionuclide therapy.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Josef PichlerDepartment of Internal Medicine and Neuro-oncology, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.
Tatjana Traub-WeidingerDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Kurt SpieglDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, Linz, Austria.
Larisa ImamovicDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, Linz, Austria.
Arthur J A T BraatDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Tom J SnijdersDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Brain Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0857-081X
Joost J C VerhoeffDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9673-0793
Patrick FlamenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Libuse TauchmanovaTelixPharmaceuticals, North Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Colin HaywardTelixPharmaceuticals, North Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Andreas KlugeABX - CRO Advanced Pharmaceutical Services Forschungsgesellschaft, Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM), the most common malignant brain tumor, is associated with devastating outcomes. IPAX-1 was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm phase I study to evaluate carrier-added 4- Methods: A total of 10 adults with recurrent GBM who had received first-line debulking surgery plus radio-chemotherapy, were randomized to a single-dose regimen (1f; Results: All dose regimens were well tolerated. Organ-absorbed radiation doses in red marrow (0.38 Gy) and kidney (1.28 Gy) confirmed no radiation-based toxicity. Stable disease was observed in 4 of the 9 patients at 3 months post-treatment (3-month follow-up [FU], 1 patient did not reach protocol-mandated end of study), yielding a response rate of 44.4%. At the 3-month FU, 6 patients demonstrated metabolic stable disease. Median progression-free survival was 4.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.3-4.5), while median overall survival was 13 months (95% CI: 7.1-27). Conclusions: Single or fractionated doses of [

Indexed as

amino acid transport systemglioblastomaradiopharmaceuticalsradiotherapytheranostics

Identifiers

PMID39211520
PMCPMC11358817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.