ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2024
Biomechanical and tomographic findings in Brown-McLean syndrome.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Resuturing a Dislocated Scleral-Fixated Intraocular Lens in Brown-McLean Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Brown-McLean syndrome (BMS) is a clinical condition characterized by peripheral corneal edema with central corneal transparency. This study aims to document the tomographic and biomechanical characteristics of 3 patients with typical BMS features using the Pentacam® AXL and CORVIS ST® (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). Observations: Three cases of BMS are presented. Case 1 involves a 26-year-old male, Case 2 a 55-year-old male, and Case 3 a 74-year-old male. The patients in Cases 1 and 3 had bilateral BMS, while the patient in Case 2 had BMS in the right eye and aphakic bullous keratopathy in the left eye. All three patients were aphakic following cataract surgery. Notably, Cases 1 and 2 were first-degree relatives (son and father), both with bilateral microspherophakia and resultant bilateral aphakia from pediatric cataract surgery. Tomographic analysis revealed a consistent increase in corneal thickness from the center to the periphery in BMS eyes, marked by an abrupt rise in the corneal thickness spatial profile (CTSP) and percentage thickness increase (PTI) curves from the thinnest point towards the periphery. There was no loss of parallel isopachs, no displacement of the thinnest point of the cornea, and no evidence of focal posterior corneal surface depression, typical signs of generalized corneal edema. Biomechanically, BMS eyes exhibited relatively normal corneal stiffness, integrated radius, Ambrósio's relational thickness to the horizontal profile (ARTh), and maximum deformation amplitude ratio at 2mm from the corneal apex (DA ratio). However, the left eye of the patient in Case 2, which had aphakic bullous keratopathy, showed altered biomechanical parameters indicative of a softer cornea with loss of rigidity. Conclusions and importance: This case series is the first to evaluate the biomechanical and tomographic features of eyes with BMS. Despite the abrupt rise in CTSP and PTI curves from the thinnest point towards the periphery, the relatively normal central corneal biomechanical indices in these BMS eyes are expected when edema is limited to the periphery. These indices become abnormal when there is progression to central corneal edema with bullous keratopathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.