Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39211348›Full record

ArticleKidney medicine2024

Development of a Resource for Health Professionals to Raise Advance Care Planning Topics During Kidney Care Consultations: A Multiple User-Centered Design.

Anna Winterbottom, Helen Hurst, Fliss E M Murtagh, Hilary L Bekker, Paula Ormandy, Barnaby Hole, Lynne Russon, Emma Murphy, Keith Bucknall, Andrew Mooney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anna WinterbottomLeeds Renal Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust & Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Helen HurstSchool of Health and Society, University of Salford and Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
Fliss E M MurtaghWolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Hilary L BekkerInstitute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Paula OrmandySchool of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, UK.
Barnaby HolePopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK and North Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Lynne RussonLeeds Renal Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust and Wheatfields Hospice, Leeds, UK.
Emma MurphyUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Centre for Care Excellence, and Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
Keith BucknallPatient and Public Involvement chair - lay member; kidney transplant recipient.
Andrew MooneyLeeds Renal Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rationale & Objective: Planning and delivering treatment pathways that integrate end-of-life care, frailty assessment, and enhanced supportive care is a service priority. Despite this, people with kidney failure are less likely to have an advance care plan and receive hospice and palliative care compared with other chronic illness populations. This is linked to health professionals feeling unskilled initiating conversations around future treatment and care options. This article describes research underpinning the development of a guide for kidney health professionals discussing end-of-life and advance care planning options with people with kidney failure and family members. Study Design: The study comprised 2 parts: an initial cross-sectional qualitative approach using in-depth interviews with older adults with kidney failure and (bereaved) carers followed by resource development with input from multiple stakeholders. Setting & Participants: Older adults with kidney failure and (bereaved) carers recruited from 2 renal units in the North of England and by online advertisements with national United Kingdom-based kidney patient charities. Resource development included input from co-applicants, independent advisory committee, patient and public involvement team, multidisciplinary health professionals and academics in the United Kingdom and Denmark. Analytical Approach: Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. Results: Twenty-seven people were interviewed: older adults with kidney failure (n = 18), carers (n = 5), bereaved carers (n = 4). Five themes are described: the context within which end-of-life conversations take place, preferences for end-of-life treatment and care, family members' role and needs in supporting people with kidney failure at the end-of-life, expectations and experience of dialysis treatment, and beliefs and experiences of death and dying. Limitations: Participants were mainly White, British, and receiving hemodialysis. Conclusions: People with (lived) experience of kidney failure informed a guide which aims to build on health professionals existing skills and improve confidence having conversations about future treatment and care. Kidney teams have expressed interest implementing the guide in practice and within their broader communications training packages.

Indexed as

Advance care planning (personalized care planning, anticipatory care)end-of-life carehealth care professionals (renal physicians, clinicians, kidney doctors, nephrologists, dialysis nurses, renal nurses, kidney nurses, nephrology nurses)kidney failure (advanced kidney disease, end-stage kidney failure, end-stage kidney disease, chronic kidney disease)palliative care (palliative treatment, hospice care)

Identifiers

PMID39211348
PMCPMC11359737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.