Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39211346›Full record

ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2024

Deep Filtered Back Projection for CT Reconstruction.

X I Tan, Xuan Liu, Kai Xiang, Jing Wang, Shan Tan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

X I TanCollege of Electrical and Information Engineering, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou 80305, China.ORCID 0009-0006-2409-6280
Xuan LiuSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Automation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.
Kai XiangSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Automation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.
Jing WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8491-4146
Shan TanSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Automation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9350-5128

Funding

Real-time prostate lesion tracking during SBRTR01EB027898 · NIBIB · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI HANNAN, RAQUIBUL, WANG, JING · 2019 to 2022
$1.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027898
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Filtered back projection (FBP) is a classic analytical algorithm for computed tomography (CT) reconstruction, with high computational efficiency. However, images reconstructed by FBP often suffer from excessive noise and artifacts. The original FBP algorithm uses a window function to smooth signals and a linear interpolation to estimate projection values at un-sampled locations. In this study, we propose a novel framework named DeepFBP in which an optimized filter and an optimized nonlinear interpolation operator are learned with neural networks. Specifically, the learned filter can be considered as the product of an optimized window function and the ramp filter, and the learned interpolation can be considered as an optimized way to utilize projection information of nearby locations through nonlinear combination. The proposed method remains the high computational efficiency of the original FBP and achieves much better reconstruction quality at different noise levels. It also outperforms the TV-based statistical iterative algorithm, with computational time being reduced in an order of two, and state-of-the-art post-processing deep learning methods that have deeper and more complicated network structures.

Indexed as

Analytical reconstructiondeep learningFBPneural network

Identifiers

PMID39211346
PMCPMC11361368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.