Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39211332›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2024

DANTE and DANTE_LTR: lineage-centric annotation pipelines for long terminal repeat retrotransposons in plant genomes.

Petr Novák, Nina Hoštáková, Pavel Neumann, Jiří Macas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A single species, different repeatomes? Genomic plasticity in Passiflora foetida L. complex and comparative insights across the subgenus Passiflora.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The repeatome landscape in the "Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  10. First draft genome of the decaploid species,GigaByte (Hong Kong, China) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Comparative Analysis of Chromosome Repeat DNA Patterns in FourInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Petr NovákBiology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, Branišovská 31, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5068-9681
Nina HoštákováBiology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, Branišovská 31, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Pavel NeumannBiology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, Branišovská 31, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6711-6639
Jiří MacasBiology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, Branišovská 31, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0829-1570

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons constitute a predominant class of repetitive DNA elements in most plant genomes. With the increasing number of sequenced plant genomes, there is an ongoing demand for computational tools facilitating efficient annotation and classification of LTR retrotransposons in plant genome assemblies. Herein, we introduce DANTE, a computational pipeline for Domain-based ANnotation of Transposable Elements, designed for sensitive detection of these elements via their conserved protein domain sequences. The identified protein domains are subsequently inputted into the DANTE_LTR pipeline to annotate complete element sequences by detecting their structural features, such as LTRs, in adjacent genomic regions. Leveraging domain sequences allows for precise classification of elements into phylogenetic lineages, offering a more granular annotation compared with coarser conventional superfamily-based classification methods. The efficiency and accuracy of this approach were evidenced via annotation of LTR retrotransposons in 93 plant genomes. Results were benchmarked against several established pipelines, showing that DANTE_LTR is capable of identifying significantly more intact LTR retrotransposons. DANTE and DANTE_LTR are provided as user-friendly Galaxy tools accessible via a public server (https://repeatexplorer-elixir.cerit-sc.cz), installable on local Galaxy instances from the Galaxy tool shed or executable from the command line.

Identifiers

PMID39211332
PMCPMC11358816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.