Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39211329›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2024

Context-adjusted proportion of singletons (CAPS): a novel metric for assessing negative selection in the human genome.

Mikhail Gudkov, Loïc Thibaut, Eleni Giannoulatou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mikhail GudkovVictor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, NSW 2010, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7008-1852
Loïc ThibautCentre for Population Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, NSW 2010, Australia.
Eleni GiannoulatouVictor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, NSW 2010, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7084-6736

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interpretation of genetic variants remains challenging, partly due to the lack of well-established ways of determining the potential pathogenicity of genetic variation, especially for understudied classes of variants. Addressing this, population genetics methods offer a practical solution by evaluating variant effects through human population distributions. Negative selection influences the ratio of singleton variants and can serve as a proxy for deleteriousness, as exemplified by the Mutability-Adjusted Proportion of Singletons (MAPS) metric. However, MAPS is sensitive to the calibration of the singletons-by-mutability linear model, which results in biased estimates for certain variant classes. Building up on the methodology used in MAPS, we introduce the Context-Adjusted Proportion of Singletons (CAPS) metric for assessing negative selection in the human genome. CAPS produces corrected estimates with more accurate confidence intervals by eliminating the mutability layer in the model. Retaining the advantageous features of MAPS, CAPS emerges as a robust and reliable tool. We believe that CAPS has the potential to enhance the identification of new disease-variant associations in clinical and research settings, offering improved accuracy in assessing negative selection for diverse SNV classes.

Identifiers

PMID39211329
PMCPMC11358819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.