Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39211007›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sustainable cities2021

Contact With Nature as a Mental Health Buffer for Lower Income Communities During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Amber L Pearson, Teresa Horton, Karin A Pfeiffer, Rachel Buxton, Joseph Gardiner, Wei Liu, Ruth F Hunter, Mathew White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sustainable cities, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ecosystem-Centered Robot Design: Toward Ecoresorbable Sustainability Robots (ESRs).Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amber L PearsonDepartment of Geography, Environment and Spatial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Teresa HortonDepartment of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Karin A PfeifferDepartment of Kinesiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Rachel BuxtonDepartment of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Joseph GardinerDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Wei LiuDepartment of Geography, Environment and Spatial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Ruth F HunterCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Mathew WhiteCognitve Science HUB, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

Impact of ecological park restoration on health in low income neighborhoods: A natural experimentR01CA239187 · NCI · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PEARSON, AMBER L. · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA239187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite a growing number of research outputs on the importance of nature contact during the COVID-19 pandemic, we know of no longitudinal research conducted prior to and during the pandemic among low-income and minority ethnicity populations, i.e. those that might be most affected. Furthermore, we have scant information about how and to what degree contact with nature might protect mental health or mitigate worsening of mental health during the pandemic. We filled these gaps using a subset of a longitudinal study of n = 86 individuals in low-income, predominantly African American, neighborhoods in Detroit, MI, USA. The study addressed the following research questions: 1) did self-reported use and perceived value of nature change during, versus prior to, the pandemic; 2) did perceived access to outdoor spaces buffer people against mental health issues such as stress, anxiety and depression symptoms; or 3) did objectively measured quality of nature views from home buffer people against mental health issues, taking into account relevant covariates and pandemic experiences (e.g., loss of employment, death of a friend/relative)? While attitudes to nature improved slightly from pre- to during the pandemic, we also observed significant decreases in most types of outdoor physical activity and passive enjoyment of nature (e.g., smelling plants/rain). We found a positive association between visibility of greenspace and perceived stress and anxiety, which not only contradicts previous research findings, but was especially surprising given that overall there was a decrease in perceived stress from 2019-2020. We did not detect associations between perceived access/use of nature and mental health. However, higher depressive symptoms were associated with exposure to more COVID-19-related stressors (lost employment, death of friends from COVID-19, etc.). Taken together, our results indicate that COVID-19 may serve to prolong or exacerbate mental health issues, rather than create them, in this population and that low quality greenspace may perhaps limit the ability for nature view to buffer mental health during the pandemic.

Indexed as

accessAfrican Americanequitygreen spaceparksstressviewshed

Identifiers

PMID39211007
PMCPMC11361375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.