Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39210945›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2024

Implications of food ultra-processing on cardiovascular risk considering plant origin foods: an analysis of the UK Biobank cohort.

Fernanda Rauber, Maria Laura da Costa Louzada, Kiara Chang, Inge Huybrechts, Marc J Gunter, Carlos Augusto Monteiro, Eszter P Vamos, Renata Bertazzi Levy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fernanda RauberDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, 01246 903, Brazil.
Maria Laura da Costa LouzadaCenter for Epidemiological Research in Nutrition and Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, 01246-904, Brazil.
Kiara ChangPublic Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, W6 8RP, United Kingdom.
Inge HuybrechtsNutrition and Metabolism Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, 69372, France.
Marc J GunterNutrition and Metabolism Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, 69372, France.
Carlos Augusto MonteiroCenter for Epidemiological Research in Nutrition and Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, 01246-904, Brazil.
Eszter P VamosPublic Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, W6 8RP, United Kingdom.
Renata Bertazzi LevyDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, 01246 903, Brazil.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Comprehensive research evidence is lacking on the role of ultra-processed foods (UPF) in the relationship between the consumption of plant-sourced foods and their impact on cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes. This study aims to assess CVD risk associated with the dietary contribution of food groups that consider both plant or animal origin and food processing categories, within a large cohort of British adults. Methods: Data from the UK Biobank participants (40-69 y) who completed at least two 24-h dietary recalls between 2009 and 2012 (n = 126,842; median follow-up: 9 y), with subsequent data linkage to hospital and mortality records, were used. Food groups were classified as either plant-sourced or non-plant/animal-sourced foods. These groups were further divided into non-UPF and UPF, and expressed as a percentage of total energy intake. Findings: Every 10 percentage points increase in plant-sourced non-UPF consumption was associated with a 7% lower risk of CVD (95% CI 0.91-0.95) and a 13% lower risk of CVD mortality (0.80-0.94). Conversely, plant-sourced UPF consumption was associated with a 5% increased risk (1.03-1.07) and a 12% higher mortality (1.05-1.20). The contribution of all UPF was linked to higher CVD risk and mortality, and no evidence for an association between contribution of all plant-sourced foods and CVD incidence and mortality was observed. Interpretation: The dietary contribution of plant-sourced non-UPF inversely linked to CVD risk, while plant-sourced UPF contribution showed a positive association. Recognizing the role of food processing is crucial for favourable CVD outcomes, even in plant-sourced diets. Funding: World Cancer Research Fund.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular diseaseMortalityPlant-based foodUltra-processed food

Identifiers

PMID39210945
PMCPMC11360147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.