ArticleAnimal bioscience2025
Performance and intestinal health of piglets in the nursery phase subjected to diets with condensed black wattle (Acacia mearnsii) tannin.
Article in Animal bioscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The eubiotic perspective on utilization of tannins in phytotherapy and nutrition of pigs.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the use of condensed tannin from black acacia (Acacia mearnsii) as a substitute additive for zinc oxide and growth-promoting antibiotics on the performance, digestibility, and intestinal health of piglets in the nursery phase.
methodsA total of 200 PIC piglets that were 22 days old and weighed 6.0±0.9 kg were subjected to four treatments in the nursery phase (22 to 64 days of age): CONTR (control diet); ENR+ZnO (control diet + 10 mg/kg of enramycin + 2,500 mg/kg of zinc oxide during the first 21 days); BUT (control diet + 900 mg/kg of sodium butyrate) and TAN (control diet + 2,000 mg/kg of condensed tannin). The experimental design was a randomized block with 4 treatments and 10 replicates, with a pen of five animals each as the experimental unit. The zootechnical performance, diarrhea index score, dietary digestibility and metagenomics of the deep rectum microbiota were evaluated.
resultsThe TAN had greater weight gain in the nursery phase and final weight (p<0.05) than the CONTR (394 vs 360 g/d, and 22.6 vs 21.1 kg, respectively), with these values being intermediate for the ENR+ZnO and BUT (365 and 382 g/d, and 21.3 and 22.1 kg, respectively). There was no difference between treatments for semi-liquid diarrhea (score 2), but CONTR had more cases of severe diarrhea (score 3; p<0.05) than ENR+ZnO, BUT and TAN, with 42, 18, 29, and 21 cases, respectively. The treatments had no impact on rare taxa or the relative abundances of taxonomic groups (uniformity), but the use of TAN promoted an increase in the abundances of Brevibacillus spp. and Enterococcus spp. compared to the other treatments (p<0.05).
conclusionThe use of condensed tannin from black wattle as a performance-enhancing additive was effective, with effects on performance and intestinal health, demonstrating its potential as a substitute for zinc oxide and enramycin in the diets of piglets in nursery phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.