Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39210619›Full record

ArticleBJU international2024

Comparison of perioperative bleeding risk between direct oral anticoagulants in transurethral resection of prostate.

Lu Yu Kuo, Jenny Kuo, Joshua Silverman, Jason Jae Yeun Kim, Caitlin Letch, Scott McClintock

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BJU international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lu Yu KuoDepartment of Urology, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9193-2449
Jenny KuoDepartment of Urology, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9195-494X
Joshua SilvermanDepartment of Urology, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6945-4997
Jason Jae Yeun KimDepartment of Urology, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Caitlin LetchSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Scott McClintockDepartment of Urology, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the perioperative morbidity and mortality associated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin for patients receiving transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). PATIENTS AND

methodsThis was a single-centre, retrospective cohort analysis of patients who underwent TURP for benign prostate hyperplasia from April 2019 to December 2023. The primary objective was to evaluate the perioperative bleeding and thromboembolic risk between anticoagulated (AC) vs no-AC patients. The secondary objective was to evaluate perioperative bleeding and thromboembolic risk between different formulations of DOACs. Patient demographics, prior treatment, prostate size, baseline bleeding risk, and operative details were collected. Bleeding and thromboembolic-related morbidity were captured within a 3-month postoperative period. Perioperative management of AC therapy was recorded, and all patients had their AC therapy withheld. Cohort characteristic between the AC vs no-AC, and DOAC groups were analysed with two-sided t-test, and chi-square test. Further logistic regression analyses were carried out to identified significant variables between the groups. These significant variables were used for adjustment in inverse probability-weighted treatment effect analysis to evaluate bleeding risk.

resultsThere were 629 patients in the cohort, and 113 (18%) patients were receiving AC therapy. The AC patients were at 1.6 times statistically significant increased risk of acute bleeding, and 11 times increased risk of prolonged haematuria for >14 days. When compared to apixaban, patients on rivaroxaban conferred a statistically significant increased risk of acute bleeding by 2.21 times. Patients receiving AC therapy had a statistically significant increased risk of stroke in the perioperative setting (no-AC vs AC: 0.4% vs 2.7%, P = 0.01).

conclusionThis is the first study to evaluate risk of bleeding for TURP patients receiving DOACs. The AC patients are more likely to experience haematuria and stroke in the perioperative period despite withholding therapy. Apixaban appears to cause less bleeding-related complications than rivaroxaban.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsProstatic HyperplasiaTransurethral Resection of ProstateAdministration, OralAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative HemorrhagePyrazolesPyridonesRetrospective StudiesRivaroxabanThromboembolismWarfarinAnticoagulantsapixabanPyrazolesPyridonesRivaroxabanWarfarinanticoagulantapixabanbleedingrivaroxabantransurethral prostatectomyTURP

Identifiers

PMID39210619
PMCPMC11603099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.