Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39210456›Full record

ReviewBMC palliative care2024

Barriers in providing quality end-of-life care as perceived by nurses working in critical care units: an integrative review.

Yousef Saleh Rubbai, Mei Chan Chong, Li Yoong Tang, Khatijah Lim Abdullah, Walid Theib Mohammad, Samira Mohajer, Mohammad Namazinia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC palliative care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yousef Saleh RubbaiDepartment of Nursing Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. y_rubbai83@yahoo.com.
Mei Chan ChongDepartment of Nursing Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. mcchong@um.edu.my.
Li Yoong TangDepartment of Nursing Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Khatijah Lim AbdullahDepartment of Nursing, School of Medical and Life Science, Sunway University, Bandar Sunway, 46200, Malaysia.
Walid Theib MohammadFaculty of medicine, Yarmouk University , Irbid, Jordan.
Samira MohajerDepartment of Nursing Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7118-1783
Mohammad NamaziniaDepartment of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heydariyeh, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2198-7556

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite increasing interest in quality end-of-life care (EOLC), critically ill patients often receive suboptimal care. Critical care nurses play a crucial role in EOLC, but face numerous barriers that hinder their ability to provide compassionate and effective care.

methodsAn integrative literature review was conducted to investigate barriers impacting the quality of end-of-life care. This review process involved searching database like MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, EBSCO, and ScienceDirect up to November 2023. Search strategies focused on keywords related to barriers in end-of-life care and critical care nurses from October 30th to November 10th, 2023. The inclusion criteria specified full-text English articles published between 2010 and 2023 that addressed barriers perceived by critical care nurses. This integrative review employs an integrated thematic analysis approach, which combines elements of deductive and inductive analysis, to explore the identified barriers, with coding and theme development overseen by the primary and secondary authors.

resultsOut of 103 articles published, 11 articles were included in the review. There were eight cross-sectional descriptive studies and three qualitative studies, which demonstrated barriers affecting end-of-life care quality. Quality appraisal using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool was completed by two authors confirmed the high credibility of the selected studies, indicating the presence of high-quality evidence across the reviewed articles. Thematic analysis led to the three main themes (1) barriers related to patients and their families, (2) barriers related to nurses and their demographic characteristics, and (3) barriers related to health care environment and institutions.

conclusionThis review highlights barriers influencing the quality of end of life care perceived by critical care nurses and the gaps that need attention to improve the quality of care provided for patients in their final stages and their fsmilies within the context of critical care. This review also notes the need for additional research to investigate the uncover patterns and insights that have not been fully explored in the existing literature to enhance understanding of these barriers. This can help to inform future research, care provision, and policy-making. Specifically, this review examines how these barriers interact, their cumulative impact on care quality, and potential strategies to overcome.

Indexed as

Quality of Health CareTerminal CareAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIntensive Care UnitsNursesPerceptionBarriersCritical care unitsNursesQuality end-of-life care

Identifiers

PMID39210456
PMCPMC11363454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.