Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39210431›Full record

Observational studyCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2024

Prognostic significance of a negative PSMA PET/CT in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.

Sara Harsini, Patrick Martineau, Sonia Plaha, Heather Saprunoff, Catherine Chen, Julia Bishop, Scott Tyldesley, Don Wilson, François Bénard

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02899312 (Fluorine-18 - 2-), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02899312 active not recruitingnot on this map

Fluorine-18 - 2-(3-(1-carboxy-5-[(6-[18F]Fluoro-pyridine-3-carbonyl)-Amino]-Pentyl)-Ureido)-Pentanedioic Acid (18F-DCFPyL) Positron Emission Tomography / Computed Tomography (PET/CT) for Assessment of Recurrent Prostate Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorBritish Columbia Cancer AgencyRan2017 to 2030Enrolled2,244ConditionsProstatic Neoplasms, Prostate CancerArmsPSMA PET/CT scan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Update on PSMA-based Prostate Cancer Imaging.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sara HarsiniDepartment of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, BC Cancer Research Institute, 675 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Patrick MartineauDepartment of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, BC Cancer Research Institute, 675 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Sonia PlahaDepartment of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, BC Cancer Research Institute, 675 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Heather SaprunoffDepartment of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, BC Cancer Research Institute, 675 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Catherine ChenDepartment of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, BC Cancer Research Institute, 675 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Julia BishopDepartment of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, BC Cancer Research Institute, 675 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Scott TyldesleyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Don WilsonDepartment of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, BC Cancer Research Institute, 675 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
François BénardDepartment of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, BC Cancer Research Institute, 675 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, Canada. fbenard@bccrc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7995-3581

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is becoming standard of care for men with biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer. The implications of a negative PSMA PET/CT scan in this population remain unclear. This study aims to assess the outcome of patients with BCR post radical prostatectomy (RP) who have negative [

methodsThis is a post-hoc subgroup analysis of a prospective non randomized clinical trial. One hundred and one patients (median age, 75 years) with BCR after RP, who tested negative on [

resultsThe median PSA level at PET/CT was 0.56 ng/mL (range, 0.4-11.3). Sixty five (64%) patients were followed without receiving further treatment, and 36 (36%) received sRT (18% to the prostate bed only and 18% to the prostate bed and pelvic lymph nodes) within 3 months of the PSMA PET. Seventeen of the sRT patients (17 of 36, 47%) received concomitant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Median follow-up was 39 months. Subsequent clinical progression was detected in 21 patients (21%), with 52% in pelvic lymph nodes, 52% in the prostatic fossa, 19% in distant lymph nodes, 14% in lungs, and 10% in bones. The FFP was 95% (95% CI: 91%-99%) at 12 months, 87% (95% CI: 81%-94%) at 24 months, and 79% (95% CI: 71%-88%) at 36 months. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that an initial International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade 5 was significantly associated with clinical progression at the last follow-up (hazard ratio, 5.1, P value, 0.04). Furthermore, the receipt of sRT correlated significantly with lower clinical progression at the last follow-up (hazard ratio, 0.2, P value, 0.03), whereas other clinical and tumor-specific parameters did not. Following surveillance-only and sRT, 29% (19 of 65) and 6% (2 of 36) of patients, respectively, showed clinical progression. In the sRT group, no significant difference was observed in FFP between patients who underwent sRT to the prostatic fossa versus those who received sRT to the prostatic fossa and pelvic lymph nodes, although the numbers in these groups were small.

conclusionsThis study suggests that salvage radiotherapy is associated with a decreased or delayed clinical progression in patients with biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy who have negative PSMA PET/CT scan results. The analysis also underscores the prognostic significance of the initial ISUP grade, with ISUP grade 5 being associated with worse outcomes.

trial registrationRegistered September 14, 2016; NCT02899312 .

Indexed as

Antigens, SurfaceGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IINeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overHumansLysineMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenSalvage Therapy2-(3-(1-carboxy-5-((6-fluoropyridine-3-carbonyl)amino)pentyl)ureido)pentanedioic acidAntigens, SurfaceFOLH1 protein, humanGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IILysineProstate-Specific AntigenUreaBiochemical recurrenceProstate cancerProstate-specific membrane antigenPSMA PET/CT

Identifiers

PMID39210431
PMCPMC11363643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.