SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024
The diagnostic value of artificial intelligence-assisted imaging for developmental dysplasia of the hip: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Automated Analysis of Pelvic Radiographs for Hip Dysplasia Screening Using Artificial Intelligence in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence to Detect Developmental Dysplasia of Hip: A Systematic Review.Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2025Pooled it
- A large-scale vision foundation model for musculoskeletal radiographs.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Outcomes at 1 Year After Total Hip Arthroplasty Combined With Low Femoral Neck Osteotomy vs Subtrochanteric Osteotomy in 73 Patients With Crowe Type IV Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Retrospective Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Scaling Early Detection for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip With Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Imaging.Cureus · 2026Review
- Computer Vision in Lower Limb Orthopaedics: A Scoping Review of Imaging-Based Artificial Intelligence Applications.Cureus · 2025Review
- Evaluation of Operator Variability and Validation of an AI-Assisted α-Angle Measurement System for DDH Using a Phantom Model.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence Algorithm Supporting the Diagnosis of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Automated Ultrasound Image Segmentation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in orthopedics: fundamentals, current applications, and future perspectives.Military Medical Research · 2025Review
- Diagnosis on Ultrasound Images for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip with a Deep Learning-Based Model Focusing on Signal Heterogeneity in the Bone Region.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Risk factors for residual acetabular dysplasia after closed reduction treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo clarify the efficacy of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted imaging in the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) through a meta-analysis.
methodsRelevant literature on AI for early DDH diagnosis was searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and The Cochrane Library databases until April 4, 2024. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool was used to assess the quality of included studies. Revman5.4 and StataSE-64 software were used to calculate the combined sensitivity, specificity, AUC value, and DOC value of AI-assisted imaging for DDH diagnosis.
resultsThe meta-analysis included 13 studies (6 prospective and 7 retrospective) with 28 AI models and a total of 10,673 samples. The summary sensitivity, specificity, AUC value, and DOC value were 99.0% (95% CI: 97.0-100.0%), 94.0% (95% CI: 89.0-96.0%), 99.0% (95% CI: 98.0-100.0%), and 1342 (95% CI: 469-3842), respectively.
conclusionAI-assisted imaging demonstrates high diagnostic efficacy for DDH detection, improving the accuracy of early DDH imaging examination. More prospective studies are needed to further confirm the value of AI-assisted imaging for early DDH diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.