Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39210366›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Beyond medical errors: exploring the interpersonal dynamics in physician-patient relationships linked to medico-legal complaints.

Mehrnaz Mostafapour, Jeffrey D Smith, Jacqueline H Fortier, Gary E Garber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Between Ideal and Actual Care: Patients' and Family Carers' Experiences of Cancer Care Relationships.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Lessons in leadership: Developing a longitudinal evidence-based teaching curriculum on professionalism in healthcare.Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mehrnaz MostafapourDepartment of Safe Medical Care Research, Canadian Medical Protective Association, Ottawa, Canada. mmostafapour@cmpa.org.
Jeffrey D SmithDepartment of Safe Medical Care Research, Canadian Medical Protective Association, Ottawa, Canada.
Jacqueline H FortierDepartment of Safe Medical Care Research, Canadian Medical Protective Association, Ottawa, Canada.
Gary E GarberDepartment of Safe Medical Care Research, Canadian Medical Protective Association, Ottawa, Canada. research@cmpa.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious research suggests that medico-legal complaints often arise from various factors influencing patient dissatisfaction, including medical errors, physician-patient relationships, communication, trust, informed consent, perceived quality of care, and continuity of care. However, these findings are not typically derived from actual patients' cases. This study aims to identify factors impacting the interpersonal dynamics between physicians and patients using real patient cases to understand how patients perceive doctor-patient relational problems that can lead to dissatisfaction and subsequent medico-legal complaints.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective study using data from closed medical regulatory authority complaint cases from the Canadian Medical Protective Association (CMPA) between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020. The study population included patients who experienced sepsis and survived, with complaints written by the patients themselves. A multi-stage standardized thematic analysis using Braun and Clarke's approach was employed. Two researchers independently coded the files to ensure the reliability of the identified codes and themes.

resultsThematic analysis of 50 patient cases revealed four broad themes: (1) Ethics in physician's work, (2) Quality of care, (3) Communication, and (4) Healthcare system/policy impacting patient satisfaction. Key sub-themes included confidentiality, honesty, patient involvement, perceived negligence, perceived lack of concern, active engagement and empathy, transparency and clarity, informed consent, respect and demeanor, lack of resources, long wait times, and insufficient time with physicians.

conclusionsThis study identifies and categorizes various factors impacting relational issues between physicians and patients, aiming to increase patient satisfaction and reduce medico-legal cases. Improving physicians' skills in areas such as communication, ethical practices, and patient involvement, as well as addressing systemic problems like long wait times, can enhance the quality of care and reduce medico-legal complaints. Additional training in communication and other skills may help promote stronger relationships between physicians and patients.

Indexed as

Medical ErrorsPatient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsQuality of Health CareAdultCanadaCommunicationFemaleHumansMaleMalpracticeMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTrustCommunication in healthcareMedico-legal complaints, patient dissatisfactionPhysician-patient relationship

Identifiers

PMID39210366
PMCPMC11361149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.