Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39210363›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2024

Targeted RT study: results on early toxicity of targeted therapies and radiotherapy.

Dinah Konnerth, Aurelie Gaasch, C Benedikt Westphalen, Kathrin Heinrich, Maximilian Niyazi, Chukwuka Eze, Paul Rogowski, Sebastian Marschner, Annemarie Zinn, Claus Belka and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Dinah KonnerthDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. dinah.konnerth@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Aurelie GaaschDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
C Benedikt WestphalenPartner Site Munich, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany.
Kathrin HeinrichPartner Site Munich, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany.
Maximilian NiyaziDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Chukwuka EzeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Paul RogowskiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sebastian MarschnerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Annemarie ZinnDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Claus BelkaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Stefanie CorradiniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Stephan SchöneckerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE/

objectiveCurrently, there are few prospective data on the tolerability of combining targeted therapies (TT) with radiation therapy (RT). The objective of this prospective study was to assess the feasibility and toxicity of pairing RT with concurrent TT in cancer patients. The aim was to enhance the existing evidence base for the simultaneous administration of targeted substances together with radiotherapy.

methodsProspective study enrollment was conducted at a single institution between March 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021, for all patients diagnosed with histologically confirmed cancer who underwent external beam radiotherapy in combination with targeted therapy. The study, known as the "targeted RT study," was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register under DRKS00026193. Systematic documentation of the toxicity profiles of different targeted therapies was performed, and the assessment of acute toxicity followed the guidelines of the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version v5.0.

resultsA total of 334 patients underwent 683 radiation therapy series. During the course of RT, 51 different TT substances were concurrently administered. External beam radiotherapy was employed for various anatomical sites. The combination of RT and concurrent TT administration was generally well tolerated, with no instances of severe acute toxicity observed. The most commonly reported toxicity was fatigue, ranging from mild to moderate Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) °I-°III. Other frequently observed toxicities included dermatitis, dyspnea, dysphagia, and dry cough. No toxicity greater than moderate severity was recorded at any point. In only 32 patients (4.7% of evaluated RT series), the concurrent substance administration was discontinued due to side effects. However, these side effects did not exceed mild severity according to CTCAE, suggesting that discontinuation was a precautionary measure. Only one patient receiving Imatinib treatment experienced a severe CTCAE °III side effect, leading to discontinuation of the concurrent substance due to the sudden occurrence of melaena during RT.

conclusionIn conclusion, the current study did not demonstrate a significant increase or additional toxicity when combining radiotherapy and concurrent targeted therapy. However, additional research is required to explore the specific toxicity profiles of the various substances that can be utilized in this context. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00026193. Date of registration 12/27/2022 (retrospectively registered).

Indexed as

Molecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChemoradiotherapyCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRadiotherapyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39210363
PMCPMC11363597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.