Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39210352›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

Temporalities of oxytocin for labour augmentation: a mixed-methods study of time factors shaping labour practices in a busy maternity unit in Tanzania.

Monica Lauridsen Kujabi, Luzango Maembe, Daniel Nkungu, Nanna Maaløe, Brenda Sequeira D'mello, Jos van Roosmalen, Thomas van den Akker, Flemming Konradsen, Kidanto Hussein, Eunice Pallangyo and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Monica Lauridsen KujabiGlobal Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. monica.kujabi@sund.ku.dk.
Luzango MaembeDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Mwanyanamala Regional Referral Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Daniel NkunguDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Morogoro Regional Referral Hospital, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Nanna MaaløeGlobal Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Brenda Sequeira D'melloGlobal Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jos van RoosmalenAthena Institute, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Thomas van den AkkerAthena Institute, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Flemming KonradsenGlobal Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kidanto HusseinMedical College East Africa, Aga Khan University, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Eunice PallangyoSchool of Nursing and Midwifery East Africa, Aga Khan University, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Morten SkovdalSection of Health Services Research, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jane Brandt SørensenGlobal Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh rates of labour augmentation with oxytocin have been found in some low- and lower-middle-income countries, causing potential perinatal harm. It is critical to understand the reasons for this overuse. Aim was to explore factors that shape practices around using oxytocin for labour augmentation in a high-volume labour ward in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

methodsMixed-methods data collection was conducted from March 2021 to February 2022, including structured observations of 234 births, 220 h of unstructured labour ward observations and 13 individual in-depth interviews with birth attendants. Thematic network analysis and descriptive statistics were used to analyse data. We used a time-lens to understand practices of oxytocin for labour augmentation in time-pressured labour wards.

resultsBirth attendants constantly had to prioritise certain care practices over others in response to time pressure. This led to overuse of oxytocin for augmentation to ensure faster labour progression and decongestion of the, often overburdened, ward. Simultaneously, birth attendants had little time to monitor foetal and maternal condition. Surprisingly, while oxytocin was used in 146 out of 234 (62.4%) structured labour observations, only 9/234 (4.2%) women had active labour lasting more than 12 h. Correspondingly, 21/48 (43.8%) women who were augmented with oxytocin in the first stage of labour had uncomplicated labour progression at the start of augmentation. While the partograph was often not used for decision-making, timing of starting oxytocin often correlated with natural cycles of ward-rounds and shift-turnovers instead of individual women's labour progression. This resulted in co-existence of 'too early' and 'too late' use of oxytocin. Liberal use of oxytocin for labour augmentation was facilitated by an underlying fear of prolonged labour and low alertness of oxytocin-related risks.

conclusionsTime scarcity in the labour ward often made birth attendants deviate from clinical guidelines for labour augmentation with oxytocin. Efforts to navigate time pressure resulted in too many women with uncomplicated labour progression receiving oxytocin with little monitoring of labour. Fear of prolonged labour and low alertness to oxytocin-mediated risks were crucial drivers. These findings call for research into safety and benefits of oxytocin in low-resource settings and interventions to address congestion in labour wards to prevent using oxytocin as a time-management tool.

Indexed as

OxytocicsOxytocinAdultFemaleHumansLabor, InducedLabor, ObstetricMidwiferyPregnancyQualitative ResearchTanzaniaTime FactorsOxytocicsOxytocinAugmentationGuidelinesIntrapartumLow-resourceOxytocinPartographPartoMaProlonged labourTime-pressureUrbanisation

Identifiers

PMID39210352
PMCPMC11363361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.