ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024
A deep convolutional neural network approach using medical image classification.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A deep learning-based radiomics model for noninvasive diagnosis of melanoma.Melanoma research · 2026Article
- MLHNet-Lung: an attention-guided multi-level CNN-transformer fusion framework with CBAM and GeM pooling for explainable multiclass lung CT image classification.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Advanced COVID-19 detection using cough signals with space reconstruction and 3D deep convolutional neural networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An ensemble model based on transfer learning for the early detection of Alzheimer's disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Convolutional Neural Network-Vision Transformer Architecture with Gated Control Mechanism and Multi-Scale Fusion for Enhanced Pulmonary Disease Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The epidemic diseases such as COVID-19 are rapidly spreading all around the world. The diagnosis of epidemic at initial stage is of high importance to provide medical care to and recovery of infected people as well as protecting the uninfected population. In this paper, an automatic COVID-19 detection model using respiratory sound and medical image based on internet of health things (IoHT) is proposed. In this model, primarily to screen those people having suspected Coronavirus disease, the sound of coughing used to detect healthy people and those suffering from COVID-19, which finally obtained an accuracy of 94.999%. This approach not only expedites diagnosis and enhances accuracy but also facilitates swift screening in public places using simple equipment. Then, in the second step, in order to help radiologists to interpret medical images as best as possible, we use three pre-trained convolutional neural network models InceptionResNetV2, InceptionV3 and EfficientNetB4 and two data sets of chest radiology medical images, and CT Scan in a three-class classification. Utilizing transfer learning and pre-existing knowledge in these models leads to notable improvements in disease diagnosis and identification compared to traditional techniques. Finally, the best result obtained for CT-Scan images belonging to InceptionResNetV2 architecture with 99.414% accuracy and for radiology images related to InceptionV3 and EfficientNetB4 architectures with the accuracy is 96.943%. Therefore, the proposed model can help radiology specialists to confirm the initial assessments of the COVID-19 disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.