ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024
CNVDeep: deep association of copy number variants with neurocognitive disorders.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Correlates of Presenile Dementia and Cognitive Decline in the Armenian Population Following COVID-19: A Case-Control Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- The Diagnostic Value of Copy Number Variants in Genetic Cardiomyopathies and Channelopathies.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCopy number variants (CNVs) have become increasingly instrumental in understanding the etiology of all diseases and phenotypes, including Neurocognitive Disorders (NDs). Among the well-established regions associated with ND are small parts of chromosome 16 deletions (16p11.2) and chromosome 15 duplications (15q3). Various methods have been developed to identify associations between CNVs and diseases of interest. The majority of methods are based on statistical inference techniques. However, due to the multi-dimensional nature of the features of the CNVs, these methods are still immature. The other aspect is that regions discovered by different methods are large, while the causative regions may be much smaller.
resultsIn this study, we propose a regularized deep learning model to select causal regions for the target disease. With the help of the proximal [20] gradient descent algorithm, the model utilizes the group LASSO concept and embraces a deep learning model in a sparsity framework. We perform the CNV analysis for 74,811 individuals with three types of brain disorders, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), schizophrenia (SCZ), and developmental delay (DD), and also perform cumulative analysis to discover the regions that are common among the NDs. The brain expression of genes associated with diseases has increased by an average of 20 percent, and genes with homologs in mice that cause nervous system phenotypes have increased by 18 percent (on average). The DECIPHER data source also seeks other phenotypes connected to the detected regions alongside gene ontology analysis. The target diseases are correlated with some unexplored regions, such as deletions on 1q21.1 and 1q21.2 (for ASD), deletions on 20q12 (for SCZ), and duplications on 8p23.3 (for DD). Furthermore, our method is compared with other machine learning algorithms.
conclusionsOur model effectively identifies regions associated with phenotypic traits using regularized deep learning. Rather than attempting to analyze the whole genome, CNVDeep allows us to focus only on the causative regions of disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.