Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39210301›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2024

Distributed non-disclosive validation of predictive models by a modified ROC-GLM.

Daniel Schalk, Raphael Rehms, Verena S Hoffmann, Bernd Bischl, Ulrich Mansmann

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel Schalk *Department of Statistics, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Raphael Rehms *Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Verena S HoffmannInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Bernd BischlDepartment of Statistics, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ulrich MansmannDepartment of Statistics, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. mansmann@ibe.med.uni-muenchen.de.

Funding

Federal Ministry for Research and Technology (BMFT) 01ZZ1804CGerman Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) 01IS18036A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDistributed statistical analyses provide a promising approach for privacy protection when analyzing data distributed over several databases. Instead of directly operating on data, the analyst receives anonymous summary statistics, which are combined into an aggregated result. Further, in discrimination model (prognosis, diagnosis, etc.) development, it is key to evaluate a trained model w.r.t. to its prognostic or predictive performance on new independent data. For binary classification, quantifying discrimination uses the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and its area under the curve (AUC) as aggregation measure. We are interested to calculate both as well as basic indicators of calibration-in-the-large for a binary classification task using a distributed and privacy-preserving approach.

methodsWe employ DataSHIELD as the technology to carry out distributed analyses, and we use a newly developed algorithm to validate the prediction score by conducting distributed and privacy-preserving ROC analysis. Calibration curves are constructed from mean values over sites. The determination of ROC and its AUC is based on a generalized linear model (GLM) approximation of the true ROC curve, the ROC-GLM, as well as on ideas of differential privacy (DP). DP adds noise (quantified by the

resultsIn our simulation scenario, the true and distributed AUC measures differ by

conclusionsThe applicability of our algorithms depends on the

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArea Under CurveROC CurveDatabases, FactualHumansLinear ModelsModels, StatisticalPrivacyArea under the ROC curveDistributed computingMedical testsROC-GLM

Identifiers

PMID39210301
PMCPMC11363434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.