Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39210300›Full record

Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2024

Effects of intraoperative different fluid therapy protocols on postoperative renal functions.

Ayça Tuba Dumanlı Özcan, Nisan Taş, Umut Cahit Ersoy, Kevser Yamen, Yusuf Yılmaz, Erdal Özcan, Cengiz Ceylan, Handan Güleç

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ayça Tuba Dumanlı ÖzcanDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. draycaozcan@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8642-6464
Nisan TaşDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-5878-8027
Umut Cahit ErsoyDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Kevser YamenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Yusuf YılmazDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0484-0483
Erdal ÖzcanDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Cengiz CeylanGeneral Surgery Department, İnönü University, Malatya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3547-9336
Handan GüleçDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePlanning intraoperative fluid therapy in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery is important. It was aimed to define the difference between fluid therapy protocols for renal function, bleeding and postoperative service follow-ups. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis is an observational case-controlled prospective study. Sixty patients aged 18-65 years who had undergone pancreatic surgery between December 2023- February 2023 were included in the study. Liberal (Group 1; n = 30) and targeted fluid therapies (Group 2; n = 30) were administered to the patients. Liberal fluid therapy was planned with 8-10 ml/kg/h crystalloid infusion. The targeted fluid therapy (TFT) group (Group 2; n = 30) began with a 2 ml/kg/h crystalloid infusion at the baseline. Additional fluid boluses were given in 250 ml of colloid infused over 10 min if PVI was > 13% for at least five minutes. The patients were staged using the KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) criteria. The amount of bleeding during surgery was recorded for both groups.

resultsNo significant difference was observed in postoperative renal function. A significant difference was observed in the amount of intraoperative bleeding. The amount of bleeding was greater in patients managed with liberal fluid therapy. No significant difference was observed between the groups in the oral intake (hour), drain withdrawal (hour) mobilization (hour) and discharge (day) times and there isn't any statistically significant differance between groups in cost effectivity (p>0.05).

conclusionKidney function was preserved during individualized targeted fluid therapy using non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring parameters.

Indexed as

Fluid TherapyIntraoperative CareAdolescentAdultAgedBlood Loss, SurgicalCase-Control StudiesCrystalloid SolutionsFemaleHumansKidneyMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesYoung AdultCrystalloid SolutionsKDIGO criteriaPancreatic surgeryTargeted fluid therapy

Identifiers

PMID39210300
PMCPMC11360291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.