Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39210285›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2024

A non-parametric approach to predict the recruitment for randomized clinical trials: an example in elderly inpatient settings.

Alejandro Villasante-Tezanos, Yong-Fang Kuo, Christopher Kurinec, Yisheng Li, Xiaoying Yu

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alejandro Villasante-TezanosDepartment of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (UTMB), Galveston, TX, USA. alvillas@utmb.edu.
Yong-Fang KuoDepartment of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (UTMB), Galveston, TX, USA.
Christopher KurinecDepartment of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (UTMB), Galveston, TX, USA.
Yisheng LiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Xiaoying YuDepartment of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (UTMB), Galveston, TX, USA.

Funding

UTMB OAIC Research Education Component (REC)P30AG024832 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI JAMES S. GOODWIN, MD, MELISSA M. MORROW · 2005 to 2026
$26.7M
NIA NIH HHS 5P30AG024832-19NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate prediction of subject recruitment, which is critical to the success of a study, remains an ongoing challenge. Previous prediction models often rely on parametric assumptions which are not always met or may be difficult to implement. We aim to develop a novel method that is less sensitive to model assumptions and relatively easy to implement.

methodsWe create a weighted resampling-based approach to predict enrollment in year two based on recruitment data from year one of the completed GRIPS and PACE clinical trials. Different weight functions accounted for a range of potential enrollment trajectory patterns. Prediction accuracy was measured by Euclidean distance for enrollment sequence in year two, total enrollment over time, and total weeks to enroll a fixed number of subjects, against the actual year two enrollment data. We compare the performance of the proposed method with an existing Bayesian method.

resultsWeighted resampling using GRIPS data resulted in closer prediction evidenced by better coverage of observed enrollment with the prediction intervals and smaller Euclidean distance from actual enrollment in year 2, especially when enrollment gaps were filled prior to the weighted resampling. These scenarios also produced more accurate predictions for total enrollment and number of weeks to enroll 50 participants. These same scenarios outperformed an existing Bayesian method for all 3 accuracy measures. In PACE data, using a reduced year 1 enrollment resulted in closer prediction evidenced by better coverage of observed enrollment with the prediction intervals and smaller Euclidean distance from actual enrollment in year 2, with the weighted resampling scenarios better reflecting the seasonal variation seen in year (1) The reduced enrollment scenarios resulted in closer prediction for total enrollment over 6 and 12 months into year (2) These same scenarios also outperformed an existing Bayesian method for relevant accuracy measures.

conclusionThe results demonstrate the feasibility and flexibility for a resampling-based, non-parametric approach for prediction of clinical trial recruitment with limited early enrollment data. Application to a wider setting and long-term prediction accuracy require further investigation.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremPatient SelectionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAgedFemaleHumansInpatientsStatistics, NonparametricClinical trial recruitmentNon-parametricPrediction modelSimulationWeighted resampling

Identifiers

PMID39210285
PMCPMC11363376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.