A comparative analysis of ENCODE and Cistrome in the context of TF binding signal.

backgroundWith the rise of publicly available genomic data repositories, it is now common for scientists to rely on computational models and preprocessed data, either as control or to discover new knowledge. However, different repositories adhere to the different principles and guidelines, and data processing plays a significant role in the quality of the resulting datasets. Two popular repositories for transcription factor binding sites data - ENCODE and Cistrome - process the same biological samples in alternative ways, and their results are not always consistent. Moreover, the output format of the processing (BED narrowPeak) exposes a feature, the signalValue, which is seldom used in consistency checks, but can offer valuable insight on the quality of the data.

resultsWe provide evidence that data points with high signalValue(s) (top 25% of values) are more likely to be consistent between ENCODE and Cistrome in human cell lines K562, GM12878, and HepG2. In addition, we show that filtering according to said high values improves the quality of predictions for a machine learning algorithm that detects transcription factor interactions based only on positional information. Finally, we provide a set of practices and guidelines, based on the signalValue feature, for scientists who wish to compare and merge narrowPeaks from ENCODE and Cistrome.

conclusionsThe signalValue feature is an informative feature that can be effectively used to highlight consistent areas of overlap between different sources of TF binding sites that expose it. Its applicability extends to downstream to positional machine learning algorithms, making it a powerful tool for performance tweaking and data aggregation.