ArticleScientific reports2024
Thermal effects and ephaptic entrainment in Hodgkin-Huxley model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Myelin Dynamics at the Axon-Oligodendrocyte Interface: Adaptive Conduction Homeostasis in Demyelination, Remyelination and White Matter Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Compensatory coupling between leak and HCN conductances defines a low dimensional solution manifold in GPe neuron subtypes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Reduced dynamical variability in depression: evidence from EEG and QIF-E network simulation.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Article
- Calcium Dynamics in Astrocyte-Neuron Communication from Intracellular to Extracellular Signaling.Cells · 2025Review
- Can ephapticity contribute to brain complexity?PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The brain is understood as an intricate biological system composed of numerous elements. It is susceptible to various physical and chemical influences, including temperature. The literature extensively explores the conditions that influence synapses in the context of cellular communication. However, the understanding of how the brain's global physical conditions can modulate ephaptic communication remains limited due to the poorly understood nature of ephapticity. This study proposes an adaptation of the Hodgkin and Huxley (HH) model to investigate the effects of ephaptic entrainment in response to thermal changes (HH-E). The analysis focuses on two distinct neuronal regimes: subthreshold and suprathreshold. In the subthreshold regime, circular statistics are used to demonstrate the dependence of phase differences with temperature. In the suprathreshold regime, the Inter-Spike Interval are employed to estimate phase preferences and changes in the spiking pattern. Temperature influences the model's ephaptic interactions and can modify its preferences for spiking frequency, with the direction of this change depending on specific model conditions and the temperature range under consideration. Furthermore, temperature enhance the anti-phase differences relationship between spikes and the external ephaptic signal. In the suprathreshold regime, ephaptic entrainment is also influenced by temperature, especially at low frequencies. This study reveals the susceptibility of ephaptic entrainment to temperature variations in both subthreshold and suprathreshold regimes and discusses the importance of ephaptic communication in the contexts where temperature may plays a significant role in neural physiology, such as inflammatory processes, fever, and epileptic seizures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.