ArticleScientific reports2024
Bobcat Optimization Algorithm: an effective bio-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for solving supply chain optimization problems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental Characterization of Emergent Behavior in Bio-Inspired Swarm Intelligence Algorithms.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Multi-Strategy Improved Dung Beetle Optimizer for High-Dimensional Optimization and Engineering Applications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prediction of college student psychological state based on deep learning framework combining the improved Whale Optimization Algorithm and LSTM.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Blockchain-enabled secure authentication and privacy-preserving information sharing in VANETs using adaptive echo state networks and dual trapdoor homomorphic encryption.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A hybrid learning framework integrating chaotic Niche alpha evolution for student academic performance prediction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An efficient feature pyramid network with adaptive LSTM for pest detection and classification in IoT.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A federated incremental blockchain framework with privacy preserving XAI optimization for securing healthcare data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Adaptive Differentiated Parrot Optimization: A Multi-Strategy Enhanced Algorithm for Global Optimization with Wind Power Forecasting Applications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Novel Black Widow Optimization Algorithm Based on Lagrange Interpolation Operator for ResNet18.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- SGA-Driven feature selection and random forest classification for enhanced breast cancer diagnosis: A comparative study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Supply chain efficiency is a major challenge in today's business environment, where efficient resource allocation and coordination of activities are essential for competitive advantage. Traditional efficiency strategies often struggle for resources for the complex and dynamic network. In response, bio-inspired metaheuristic algorithms have emerged as powerful tools to solve these optimization problems. Referring to the random search nature of metaheuristic algorithms and emphasizing that no metaheuristic algorithm is the best optimizer for all optimization applications, the No Free Lunch (NFL) theorem encourages researchers to design newer algorithms to be able to provide more effective solutions to optimization problems. Motivated by the NFL theorem, the innovation and novelty of this paper is in designing a new meta-heuristic algorithm called Bobcat Optimization Algorithm (BOA) that imitates the natural behavior of bobcats in the wild. The basic inspiration of BOA is derived from the hunting strategy of bobcats during the attack towards the prey and the chase process between them. The theory of BOA is stated and then mathematically modeled in two phases (i) exploration based on the simulation of the bobcat's position change while moving towards the prey and (ii) exploitation based on simulating the bobcat's position change during the chase process to catch the prey. The performance of BOA is evaluated in optimization to handle the CEC 2017 test suite for problem dimensions equal to 10, 30, 50, and 100, as well as to address CEC 2020. The optimization results show that BOA has a high ability in exploration, exploitation, and balance them during the search process in order to achieve a suitable solution for optimization problems. The results obtained from BOA are compared with the performance of twelve well-known metaheuristic algorithms. The findings show that BOA has been successful in handling the CEC 2017 test suite in 89.65, 79.31, 93.10, and 89.65% of the functions for the problem dimension equal to 10, 30, 50, and 100, respectively. Also, the findings show that in order to handle the CEC 2020 test suite, BOA has been successful in 100% of the functions of this test suite. The statistical analysis confirms that BOA has a significant statistical superiority in the competition with the compared algorithms. Also, in order to analyze the efficiency of BOA in dealing with real world applications, twenty-two constrained optimization problems from CEC 2011 test suite and four engineering design problems have been selected. The findings show that BOA has been successful in 90.90% of CEC2011 test suite optimization problems and in 100% of engineering design problems. In addition, the efficiency of BOA to handle SCM applications has been challenged to solve ten case studies in the field of sustainable lot size optimization. The findings show that BOA has successfully provided superior performance in 100% of the case studies compared to competitor algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.