ArticleBMJ open2024
Health insurance, social safety net and maternal health service utilisation in Pakistan: a population based cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Universal Health Coverage in Pakistan: Challenges, Reforms, and the Road to 2030.Annals of global health · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of the study is to examine the impact of health insurance and social safety net programmes on maternal health service utilisation (MHSU) in Pakistan.
designCross-sectional. SETTINGS: Data were obtained from Pakistan Demographic Health Survey 2017-2018.
participantsOut of 12 364 Pakistani ever-married women aged 15-49 years included in the survey sample, 7752 were included in the study.
main outcome measuresThree response variables (antenatal care (ANC) by skilled attendants (<4 visits=inadequate vs 4 or more visits=adequate), health facility-based delivery (home vs health) and postnatal care (yes vs no) were combined to assess MHSU. Health insurance was derived from the question 'are you covered with any health insurance?' and social safety net was derived from enrolment in social safety net programmes. Logistic regression analyses were conducted, and results were reported as ORs with 95% CIs. Results of adjusted logistic regression models were fit to control for individual and community-level factors.
resultPrevalence of social safety net was larger than health insurance (7.7% vs 2.0%) while attendance of ANC+4, facility-based delivery and postnatal care was 48.5% (n=3760), 65.9% (n=5097) and 22.6% (n=1745) respectively, among respondents. Women were twice more likely to access maternal health services when they were covered by health insurance (adjusted OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.19 to 5.74, p<0.017) after adjusting for age at marriage, education level, wealth index, rural/urban area, parity, employment, empowerment status, exposure to media, visits and distance to health facility while no significant association of social safety net programmes with MHSU was found.
conclusionExpanding access to health insurance can provide comprehensive coverage for maternal healthcare services. Social safety net programmes can be made conditional, subject to regular health checkups for mothers and children to improve maternal and child health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.