ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2024
Using an Ensemble of Segmentation Methods to Detect Vertebral Bodies on Radiographs.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men study (MrOS): a 25-yr landmark study of skeletal health in older men.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeVertebral compression fractures may indicate osteoporosis but are underdiagnosed and underreported by radiologists. We have developed an ensemble of vertebral body (VB) segmentation models for lateral radiographs as a critical component of an automated, opportunistic screening tool. Our goal is to detect the approximate location of thoracic and lumbar VBs, including fractured vertebra, on lateral radiographs. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study (MrOS) data set includes spine radiographs of 5994 men aged ≥65 years from 6 clinical centers. Two segmentation models, U-Net and Mask-RCNN (Region-based Convolutional Neural Network), were independently trained on the MrOS data set retrospectively, and an ensemble was created by combining them. Primary performance metrics for VB detection success included precision, recall, and F1 score for object detection on a held-out test set. Intersection over union (IoU) and Dice coefficient were also calculated as secondary metrics of performance for the test set. A separate external data set from a quaternary health care enterprise was acquired to test generalizability, comprising diagnostic clinical radiographs from men and women aged ≥65 years.
resultsThe trained models achieved F1 score of U-Net = 83.42%, Mask-RCNN = 86.30%, and ensemble = 88.34% in detecting all VBs, and F1 score of U-Net = 87.88%, Mask-RCNN = 92.31%, and ensemble = 97.14% in detecting severely fractured vertebrae. The trained models achieved an average IoU per VB of 0.759 for U-Net and 0.709 for Mask-RCNN. The trained models achieved F1 score of U-Net = 81.11%, Mask-RCNN = 79.24%, and ensemble = 87.72% in detecting all VBs in the external data set.
conclusionsAn ensemble model combining predictions from U-Net and Mask-RCNN resulted in the best performance in detecting VBs on lateral radiographs and generalized well to an external data set. This model could be a key component of a pipeline to detect fractures on all vertebrae in a radiograph in an automated, opportunistic screening tool under development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.