Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39209456›Full record

ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2024

Immune checkpoint blockade: timing is everything.

Frank A Sinicrope, Mary Jo Turk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Frank A SinicropeDivision of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA Sinicrope.Frank@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2907-1000
Mary Jo TurkDartmouth Cancer Center and the Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9612-8329

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Fred W Kolling IV · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
Tissue Resident memory T cell responses to cancerR01CA225028 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Mary Jo Turk · 2018 to 2026
$4.9M
Sustaining Tissue Resident Memory T cellsR01CA254042 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Yina Hsing Huang, Mary Jo Turk · 2022 to 2026
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NCI NIH HHS R01 CA225028NCI NIH HHS R01 CA254042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy effectively uses the in situ tumor as a reservoir of tumor antigens to promote systemic antitumor immunity. Studies indicate that intratumoral responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are mediated by resident memory T cells cells that are sequestered in tumors and have specificity for a wide range of tumor antigens ICI treatment produces de novo priming of CD8

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsHumansImmunotherapyNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasmsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorImmunotherapyNeoadjuvantT cell

Identifiers

PMID39209456
PMCPMC11409242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.