Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39209450›Full record

ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2024

Inclusion, characteristics, and reporting of older adults in FDA registration studies of immunotherapy, 2018-2022.

Colm Mac Eochagain, Robert Power, Christine Sam, Nicolas M Gonzalez-Senac, Darren Walsh, Mukul Roy, Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Representation of Older Adult Patients in Clinical Trials.Clinical and translational science · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Colm Mac EochagainDepartment of Medical Oncology, Trinity St James' Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland colmme@gmail.com.
Robert PowerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Trinity St James' Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland.
Christine SamH Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Nicolas M Gonzalez-SenacGeriatrics Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain.
Darren WalshDepartment of Medical Oncology, Waterford University Hospital, Waterford, Ireland.
Mukul RoyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jaslok Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, India.
Nicolò Matteo Luca BattistiDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have transformed the management of cancer, particularly for older adults, who constitute a majority of the global cancer patient population. This study aimed to assess the inclusion, characteristics, and reporting of older adults enrolled in Food and Drug Administration (FDA) registration clinical trials of ICI between 2018 and 2022. Clinical trials of ICI leading to an FDA approval in solid tumor oncology between 2018 and 2022 were included. Primary study reports and all available secondary publications were assessed. The availability and completeness of older subgroup data for protocol-defined clinical efficacy endpoints, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and toxicity outcomes, and baseline characteristics were assessed according to predefined criteria which categorized reporting completeness hierarchically in relation to the availability of published data, including effect size, sample size, and measures of precision. 53 registration trials were included, involving a total of 37,094 participants. Most trials (64.2%) were of ICI combination therapy. 42.3% of patients were aged≥65 years; 11.1% were aged≥75. No trials specified an upper age limit for eligibility. 98.1% of trials excluded patients with European Cooperative Oncology Group performance status>1. 87.2% of primary efficacy endpoints and 17.9% of secondary efficacy endpoints were reported completely for older adults. Five studies (9.4%) reported baseline characteristics, three (6.1%) reported HRQOL assessments, and four (7.5%) reported toxicity outcomes completely among older subgroups. No trials conducted baseline geriatric assessments or reported geriatric-specific symptoms or quality of life scales. This analysis highlights significant deficits in the enrollment and reporting of older subgroups in pivotal trials of ICI therapy. The findings highlight an urgent need for improved reporting and inclusion standards in clinical trials of ICI to better inform treatment decisions for older adults.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMaleNeoplasmsQuality of LifeUnited StatesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsGeriatricImmune Checkpoint InhibitorImmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39209450
PMCPMC11367347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.