ReviewInternational journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society2024
Assessing minimally invasive simple hysterectomy in low risk cervical cancer: set up for the LASH trial.
Review in International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Simple hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy versus radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for women with stage IA2-IB1 cervical cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Minimally invasive simple hysterectomy in low-risk cervical cancer: a single-arm trial with stopping rules (ENGOT-cx23/MITO/LASH trial).International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2025Trial
- Nationwide trends in surgery selection and minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer with preoperative T1B1/T1B2 disease in Japan.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Review
- The future of gynecologic oncologic surgery: a narrative review of current surgical trials.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2026Review
- Novel Treatment Concepts for Cervical Cancer-Moving Towards Personalized Therapy.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- New Surgical Techniques for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Under 2 cm : Is There Enough Evidence?Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Review
- Editorial: Changing backgrounds and groundbreaking changes: gynecological surgery in the third decade of the 21st century volume II.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
After the publication of the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial, open surgery has become the standard approach for radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer. Recent studies assessed the role of a non-radical approach in low risk cervical cancer and showed no survival difference compared with radical hysterectomy. However, there is a gap in knowledge regarding the oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive simple hysterectomy in low risk cervical cancer. This review offers an overview of the current evidence on the role of the minimally invasive approach in low risk cervical cancer and raises the need for a new clinical trial in this setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.