Observational studyAsia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition2024
Nutritional therapy among adult patients with severe burns: A retrospective observational study.
Observational study in Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe objective of this study was to examine the effects of nutritional therapy in adult patients with severe burns. METHODS AND STUDY
designSixty adult patients with severe burns were enrolled. Data on nutritional intake through enteral nutrition (EN) or parenteral nutrition (PN) on days 7, 14, 21, and 28 post-injury were collected. Patients were divided into target and non-target groups according to whether their energy or protein intake reached the target. Age, length of ventilation, and total bilirubin (TBIL), albumin (ALB), prealbumin (pALB), and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations of patients were recorded.
resultsThe percentage of protein targets with protein delivery was lower than that of energy target with energy delivery. The ratio of PN protein to total protein was lower than that of PN energy to total energy on days 7, 14, 21, and 28 (p<0.001, p<0.001, p=0.001, and p=0.003, respectively). Compared to the non-target group on day 21, the target group was younger, had lower TBIL on day 7, higher ALB and pALB on day 21, and lower CRP on day 14 (p=0.025, p=0.021, p=0.028, p=0.029, and p=0.049, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that older age and longer ventilation were independent risk factors in patients who did not meet the nutritional target on day 21 (p=0.026 and p=0.043, respectively).
conclusionsThe protein intake of adult patients with severe burns was low. Compared to the non-target group, the target group had better laboratory test results. Older age and longer ventilation were independent risk factors for patients not meeting the nutritional target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.