Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39209340›Full record

ReviewBMJ military health2025

Clothing and individual equipment for the female soldier: developing a framework to improve the evidence base which informs future design and evaluation.

Nicola C Armstrong, S A Rodrigues, K M Gruevski, K B Mitchell, A Fogarty, S Saunders, L Bossi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ military health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicola C ArmstrongDefence Science and Technology Laboratory, Salisbury, UK ncarmstrong@dstl.gov.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8088-0279
S A RodriguesHuman Sciences, Defence Science & Technology, New Zealand Defence Force, Auckland, New Zealand.
K M GruevskiDefence Research and Development Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
K B MitchellUS Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Soldier Center, Natick, Massachusetts, USA.
A FogartyDefence Science and Technology Group, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0938-8684
S SaundersDefence Science and Technology Laboratory, Salisbury, UK.
L BossiDefence Research and Development Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of inclusive equipment and clothing is a priority across national defence departments that are part of The Technical Cooperation Programme. As such, a collaborative effort has been established to inform the development of clothing and equipment for women. This invited review provides an overview of an ongoing collaborative project presented at the sixth International Congress on Soldiers Physical Performance. The purpose of this review was to summarise the outputs of scoping work conducted to inform the direction of future research programmes. The scoping work has recommended a framework, which includes improved objective metrics for assessment, standardised methods to characterise study participants and improved methods for characterising the system being evaluated. The longer-term research project aims to implement the framework so that the design of future equipment and clothing is optimised for all end users.

Indexed as

ClothingEquipment DesignMilitary PersonnelFemaleHumansAnatomyMusculoskeletal disordersPhysiology

Identifiers

PMID39209340
PMCPMC12505033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.