ArticleMethods of information in medicine2024
Cross-lingual Natural Language Processing on Limited Annotated Case/Radiology Reports in English and Japanese: Insights from the Real-MedNLP Workshop.
Article in Methods of information in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing privacy-preserving deployable large language models for perioperative complication detection: a targeted strategy with LoRA fine-tuning.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Development of a Large-Scale Dataset of Chest Computed Tomography Reports in Japanese and a High-Performance Finding Classification Model: Dataset Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Elucidating Celecoxib's Preventive Effect in Capecitabine-Induced Hand-Foot Syndrome Using Medical Natural Language Processing.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2025Article
- Natural language processing of electronic medical records identifies cardioprotective agents for anthracycline induced cardiotoxicity.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Post-marketing surveillance of anticancer drugs using natural language processing of electronic medical records.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTextual datasets (corpora) are crucial for the application of natural language processing (NLP) models. However, corpus creation in the medical field is challenging, primarily because of privacy issues with raw clinical data such as health records. Thus, the existing clinical corpora are generally small and scarce. Medical NLP (MedNLP) methodologies perform well with limited data availability.
objectivesWe present the outcomes of the Real-MedNLP workshop, which was conducted using limited and parallel medical corpora. Real-MedNLP exhibits three distinct characteristics: (1) limited annotated documents: the training data comprise only a small set (∼100) of case reports (CRs) and radiology reports (RRs) that have been annotated. (2) Bilingually parallel: the constructed corpora are parallel in Japanese and English. (3) Practical tasks: the workshop addresses fundamental tasks, such as named entity recognition (NER) and applied practical tasks.
methodsWe propose three tasks: NER of ∼100 available documents (Task 1), NER based only on annotation guidelines for humans (Task 2), and clinical applications (Task 3) consisting of adverse drug effect (ADE) detection for CRs and identical case identification (CI) for RRs.
resultsNine teams participated in this study. The best systems achieved 0.65 and 0.89 F1-scores for CRs and RRs in Task 1, whereas the top scores in Task 2 decreased by 50 to 70%. In Task 3, ADE reports were detected by up to 0.64 F1-score, and CI scored up to 0.96 binary accuracy.
conclusionMost systems adopt medical-domain-specific pretrained language models using data augmentation methods. Despite the challenge of limited corpus size in Tasks 1 and 2, recent approaches are promising because the partial match scores reached ∼0.8-0.9 F1-scores. Task 3 applications revealed that the different availabilities of external language resources affected the performance per language.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.