ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2024
Food processing according to the NOVA classification is not associated with glycemic index and glycemic load: results from an analysis of 1995 food items.
Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Corn Flour Consumption on Human Health across the Lifespan: A Scoping Review.The Journal of nutrition · 2025Article
- Minimally processed foods have a higher total antioxidant content compared to processed and ultra-processed foods: results from an analysis of 1946 food items.The British journal of nutrition · 2024Article
- The Intersection of Ultra-Processed Foods, Neuropsychiatric Disorders, and Neurolaw: Implications for Criminal Justice.NeuroSci · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUltraprocessed foods (UPFs) comprise most calories in the United States diet. Glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) are measures of the quality and quantity of carbohydrates in food based on their effect on postprandial blood glucose. Diets high in UPFs and GI/GL are associated with chronic metabolic diseases but the relationship between them is unclear.
objectivesOur objective was to examine the GI and GL of foods assigned to NOVA food processing groups. We hypothesized that GI and GL would be lowest in minimally processed foods (MPFs) compared to processed food (PRF) and UPF (with no difference between PRF and UPF).
methodsGI and GL values produced by healthy individuals for 1995 food items were collated from published sources. Food items were manually coded by processing levels according to NOVA classification. In addition, as the effects of processing on glycemic potential may vary between types of foods, food items were coded into 8 groups (beans, nuts, and seeds; beverages; dairy; fats and sweets; fruit; grains; fish, meat, and poultry; and vegetables). Multilevel linear modeling was used to determine significance with an α value of 0.05.
resultsThe effect of food processing on GI and GL was contrary to our hypothesis as means did not differ significantly across processing levels: GI-MPF: 54.1 ± 19.5, PRF: 53.2 ± 18.9, UPF: 49.3 ± 18.1 (P = 0.712); GL-MPF: 17.1 ± 10.3, PRF: 15.8 ± 12.4, UPF; 11.5 ± 7.9 (P = 0.890). Within food groups, there was no significant association between processing level and GI (P = 0.184), but GL was inversely associated with grains and vegetables (P < 0.001).
conclusionsAcross analyzed foods, GI and GL do not differ between processing levels, whereas GL was lower in ultraprocessed grains and vegetables than MPF. Any potential adverse outcomes associated with UPF are unlikely to be related to effects on glycemia. This project was preregistered at the Open Science Framework (OSF) Registries through the Center for Open Science as 10.17605/OSF.IO/PJWG9.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.