ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2024
Outcomes of Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Managed in a Non-Intensive Care Unit Setting.
Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) requires significant health-care resources. The modified Brain Injury Guidelines (mBIG) stratifies TBI patients by severity to help guide disposition and management. We sought to analyze the outcomes of TBI patients managed in a non-intensive care unit (ICU) setting after stratifying them using the mBIG criteria.
methodsA retrospective single-center study was performed on all adult patients who sustained blunt TBI from 2021 to 2022 and were managed in a non-ICU setting. Primary outcome was unplanned upgrade to the ICU. Secondary outcomes were need for neurosurgical intervention, unplanned intubation, mortality, and hospital length of stay. Patients were divided into cohorts of mBIG 1 & 2 versus mBIG 3.
resultsOf the 274 patients managed in a non-ICU setting, 119 (43.4%) met mBIG 3 criteria. The majority (76.5%) were managed in a step-down level of care. Nine patients required upgrade to the ICU, with only two upgraded for acute progression of their intracranial hemorrhage. Eight patients in mBIG 3 cohort required neurosurgical interventions, with only two related to progression of their intracranial hemorrhage and both over 24 h after admission. The remaining six patients had planned delayed neurosurgical intervention. Unplanned intubation occurred in three patients with only one related to a delayed progression of their TBI. Longer hospitalization and decreased survival were noted in mBIG 3 group. No differences in 30-d readmissions, stroke, venous thromboembolism events or seizures were found between the two groups.
conclusionsSelect patients with severe TBI may be considered for admission to step-down units with frequent neurologic exams in lieu of ICU level of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.