Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39208403›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2025

NANO-LM: An updated scorecard for the clinical assessment of patients with leptomeningeal metastases.

Emilie Le Rhun, Lakshmi Nayak, Mary Jane Lim-Fat, Roberta Rudà, Elena Pentsova, Peter Forsyth, Barbara J O'Brien, Matthias Preusser, Priya Kumthekar, Dieta Brandsma and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06417710 (Standardized Clinical Assessment of Patients With Leptomeningeal Metastasis), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06417710 recruitingnot on this map

Standardized Clinical Assessment of Patients With Leptomeningeal Metastasis

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of ZurichRan2022 to 2026Enrolled200ConditionsLeptomeningeal Metastasis, Leptomeningeal Disease, Leptomeningeal Neoplasms, Leptomeningeal CancerArmsNeurological Assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Emilie Le RhunDepartments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9408-3278
Lakshmi NayakCenter for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Mary Jane Lim-FatDivision of Neurology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Roberta RudàDivision of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Elena PentsovaDepartment of Neurology, Brain Tumor Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5854-0251
Peter ForsythDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3756-8594
Barbara J O'BrienDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Matthias PreusserDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine 1, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3541-2315
Priya KumthekarThe Lou and Jean Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5923-0677
Dieta BrandsmaDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7998-9904
Michael WellerDepartment of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1748-174X

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Core P30-CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748Promedica FoundationSophien FoundationStiftung für angewandte KrebsforschungUniversity Hospital Zurich Cancer Center
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are no validated tools for the clinical neurological assessment of patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LM). However, clinical examination during the course of the disease guides medical management and is part of response assessment in clinical trials. Because neuroimaging may not always be obtained owing to rapid clinical deterioration, clinical neurological assessment of LM is essential, and standardization is important to minimize rater disagreement.

methodsThe Response Assessment in Neuro-oncology-LM group launched a 2-step process, aiming at improving and standardizing the clinical assessment of patients with LM. We report here on the first step the establishment of a consensus scorecard. The task force had 9 virtual meetings to define general recommendations on neurological assessment and selected domains of interest that should be tested.

resultsFourteen domains of neurological symptoms and signs were selected: level of consciousness, cognition, nausea and vomiting, vision, eye movement, facial strength, hearing, swallowing, speech, limb strength, limb ataxia, walking, and bladder bowel functions. For each item, a clear instruction on how to perform the assessment is provided with scoring criteria between 0 and 2. The general clinical status of the patient and use of steroids, pain medications, and antiemetics should be documented. Neurological sequelae from previous brain metastases or cancer treatment should be rated at the baseline evaluation; it should be specified when symptoms or signs may be related to a condition other than LM. DISCUSSION: A revised Neurological Assessment in Neuro-Oncology-LM consensus scorecard for clinical assessment has been established. An international prospective validation study of the proposal is currently ongoing (NCT06417710).

Indexed as

Diagnostic Techniques, NeurologicalMeningeal CarcinomatosisMeningeal NeoplasmsHumansPrognosisexaminationNANOneoplasticneurologicalresponsescale

Identifiers

PMID39208403
PMCPMC11812256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.