ReviewJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024
A review of reinforcement learning for natural language processing and applications in healthcare.
Review in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Convergence of need technology and culture driving the era of physical AI in medicine.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Closing the loop: human-augmented, mechanistically enhanced AI for proactive management of drug-drug interactions.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Large language models in clinical trials: applications, technical advances, and future directions.BMC medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceReinforcement learning (RL) represents a pivotal avenue within natural language processing (NLP), offering a potent mechanism for acquiring optimal strategies in task completion. This literature review studies various NLP applications where RL has demonstrated efficacy, with notable applications in healthcare settings.
objectivesTo systematically explore the applications of RL in NLP, focusing on its effectiveness in acquiring optimal strategies, particularly in healthcare settings, and provide a comprehensive understanding of RL's potential in NLP tasks. MATERIALS AND
methodsAdhering to the PRISMA guidelines, an exhaustive literature review was conducted to identify instances where RL has exhibited success in NLP applications, encompassing dialogue systems, machine translation, question-answering, text summarization, and information extraction. Our methodological approach involves closely examining the technical aspects of RL methodologies employed in these applications, analyzing algorithms, states, rewards, actions, datasets, and encoder-decoder architectures.
resultsThe review of 93 papers yields insights into RL algorithms, prevalent techniques, emergent trends, and the fusion of RL methods in NLP healthcare applications. It clarifies the strategic approaches employed, datasets utilized, and the dynamic terrain of RL-NLP systems, thereby offering a roadmap for research and development in RL and machine learning techniques in healthcare. The review also addresses ethical concerns to ensure equity, transparency, and accountability in the evolution and application of RL-based NLP technologies, particularly within sensitive domains such as healthcare. DISCUSSION: The findings underscore the promising role of RL in advancing NLP applications, particularly in healthcare, where its potential to optimize decision-making and enhance patient outcomes is significant. However, the ethical challenges and technical complexities associated with RL demand careful consideration and ongoing research to ensure responsible and effective implementation.
conclusionsBy systematically exploring RL's applications in NLP and providing insights into technical analysis, ethical implications, and potential advancements, this review contributes to a deeper understanding of RL's role for language processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.