Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39208319›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024

A review of reinforcement learning for natural language processing and applications in healthcare.

Ying Liu, Haozhu Wang, Huixue Zhou, Mingchen Li, Yu Hou, Sicheng Zhou, Fang Wang, Rama Hoetzlein, Rui Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ying LiuDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.
Haozhu WangAmazon Web Service, Seattle, WA 98109, United States.
Huixue ZhouDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6524-5506
Mingchen LiDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.
Yu HouDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.
Sicheng ZhouDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.
Fang WangAmazon Web Service, Seattle, WA 98109, United States.
Rama HoetzleinR&D, Quanta Sciences, Ithaca, NY 14850, United States.
Rui ZhangDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8258-3585

Funding

Detecting synergistic effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for AD/ADRDR01AG078154 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HUA XU, RUI ZHANG · 2022 to 2026
$4.2M
A Translational Informatics Framework to Mine Efficacy and Safety of Dietary SupplementsR01AT009457 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI RUI ZHANG · 2017 to 2026
$4.1M
SCH: A New Computational Framework for Learning from Imbalanced Biomedical DataR01CA287413 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CUI, YING, SUN, JU · 2023 to 2025
$1.2M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT009457NCCIH NIH HHS R01AT009457NCI NIH HHS R01 CA287413NCI NIH HHS R01CA287413NIA NIH HHS R01 AG078154NIA NIH HHS R01AG078154NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceReinforcement learning (RL) represents a pivotal avenue within natural language processing (NLP), offering a potent mechanism for acquiring optimal strategies in task completion. This literature review studies various NLP applications where RL has demonstrated efficacy, with notable applications in healthcare settings.

objectivesTo systematically explore the applications of RL in NLP, focusing on its effectiveness in acquiring optimal strategies, particularly in healthcare settings, and provide a comprehensive understanding of RL's potential in NLP tasks. MATERIALS AND

methodsAdhering to the PRISMA guidelines, an exhaustive literature review was conducted to identify instances where RL has exhibited success in NLP applications, encompassing dialogue systems, machine translation, question-answering, text summarization, and information extraction. Our methodological approach involves closely examining the technical aspects of RL methodologies employed in these applications, analyzing algorithms, states, rewards, actions, datasets, and encoder-decoder architectures.

resultsThe review of 93 papers yields insights into RL algorithms, prevalent techniques, emergent trends, and the fusion of RL methods in NLP healthcare applications. It clarifies the strategic approaches employed, datasets utilized, and the dynamic terrain of RL-NLP systems, thereby offering a roadmap for research and development in RL and machine learning techniques in healthcare. The review also addresses ethical concerns to ensure equity, transparency, and accountability in the evolution and application of RL-based NLP technologies, particularly within sensitive domains such as healthcare. DISCUSSION: The findings underscore the promising role of RL in advancing NLP applications, particularly in healthcare, where its potential to optimize decision-making and enhance patient outcomes is significant. However, the ethical challenges and technical complexities associated with RL demand careful consideration and ongoing research to ensure responsible and effective implementation.

conclusionsBy systematically exploring RL's applications in NLP and providing insights into technical analysis, ethical implications, and potential advancements, this review contributes to a deeper understanding of RL's role for language processing.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNatural Language ProcessingAlgorithmsDelivery of Health CareHumanshealthcarenatural language processingreinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID39208319
PMCPMC11413430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.