Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39208311›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024

Relation extraction using large language models: a case study on acupuncture point locations.

Yiming Li, Xueqing Peng, Jianfu Li, Xu Zuo, Suyuan Peng, Donghong Pei, Cui Tao, Hua Xu, Na Hong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A review of recent artificial intelligence for traditional medicine.Journal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Leveraging GPT-4o for Automated Extraction of Neural Projections from Scientific Literature.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yiming LiMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-8784-1745
Xueqing PengDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, United States.
Jianfu LiDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, United States.
Xu ZuoMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Suyuan PengInstitute of Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100010, China.
Donghong PeiThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Cui TaoDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, United States.
Hua XuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5274-4672
Na HongDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, United States.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn acupuncture therapy, the accurate location of acupoints is essential for its effectiveness. The advanced language understanding capabilities of large language models (LLMs) like Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPTs) and Llama present a significant opportunity for extracting relations related to acupoint locations from textual knowledge sources. This study aims to explore the performance of LLMs in extracting acupoint-related location relations and assess the impact of fine-tuning on GPT's performance. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe utilized the World Health Organization Standard Acupuncture Point Locations in the Western Pacific Region (WHO Standard) as our corpus, which consists of descriptions of 361 acupoints. Five types of relations ("direction_of", "distance_of", "part_of", "near_acupoint", and "located_near") (n = 3174) between acupoints were annotated. Four models were compared: pre-trained GPT-3.5, fine-tuned GPT-3.5, pre-trained GPT-4, as well as pretrained Llama 3. Performance metrics included micro-average exact match precision, recall, and F1 scores.

resultsOur results demonstrate that fine-tuned GPT-3.5 consistently outperformed other models in F1 scores across all relation types. Overall, it achieved the highest micro-average F1 score of 0.92. DISCUSSION: The superior performance of the fine-tuned GPT-3.5 model, as shown by its F1 scores, underscores the importance of domain-specific fine-tuning in enhancing relation extraction capabilities for acupuncture-related tasks. In light of the findings from this study, it offers valuable insights into leveraging LLMs for developing clinical decision support and creating educational modules in acupuncture.

conclusionThis study underscores the effectiveness of LLMs like GPT and Llama in extracting relations related to acupoint locations, with implications for accurately modeling acupuncture knowledge and promoting standard implementation in acupuncture training and practice. The findings also contribute to advancing informatics applications in traditional and complementary medicine, showcasing the potential of LLMs in natural language processing.

Indexed as

Acupuncture PointsNatural Language ProcessingAcupuncture TherapyHumansacupuncture pointsGPTlarge language modelprompt tuningrelation extraction

Identifiers

PMID39208311
PMCPMC11491641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.