ArticlePloS one2024
Calibration and test of contact parameters for alfalfa stalk at primary florescence based on discrete element method.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Calibration of physical and mechanical property parameters of broccoli seedling stalks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Calibration of discrete element parameters for cohesive soils at different moisture contents.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In view of the lack of accurate models for discrete element simulation in the current research and development process of forage harvesting and crushing machinery, the contact parameters were calibrated based on Hertz-Mindlin (no slip) contact model by EDEM simulation software with alfalfa stalk at primary florescence as the research object. Based on the angle of repose, the restitution coefficient, static friction coefficient, rolling friction coefficient of alfalfa stalks were determined through the Placket-Burman test, steepest ascent test and Box-Behnken test. The simulation test of the repose angle was carried out with the determined contact parameters. The results showed that the relative error between the simulated repose angle and the physical test repose angle was 0.48%, which indicated that the calibrated contact parameters could truly reflect the physical characteristics of alfalfa stalks at the primary florescence. It provided a reliable model and parameter calibration method for the discrete element simulation in the research and development process of forage machinery, and also provided a reference for the research and optimization design of forage harvesting, crushing and processing machinery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.