Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39208241›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Comparison of Indocyanine Green with conventional tracers for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: A multidisciplinary evaluation of clinical effectiveness, safety, organizational and economic impact.

Maria Pinelli, Chiara Gerardi, Emanuele Lettieri, Madalina Maioru, Laura Marone, Lorenzo Bertoldi, Giuseppe Navanteri, Maurizio Costantini, Claudio Botti, Francesca Pellini

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maria PinelliDepartment of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3993-0585
Chiara GerardiIstituto Di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
Emanuele LettieriDepartment of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Madalina MaioruDepartment of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Laura MaroneDepartment of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Lorenzo BertoldiOncology Department Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata (AOUI) Verona, Complex Operative Unit (UOC) Breast Surgery, Breast Unit, Verona, Italy.
Giuseppe NavanteriClinical Engineering (IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena-Roma, Italy), Roma, Italy.
Maurizio CostantiniDepartment Breast Surgery (IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena-Roma, Italy), Roma, Italy.
Claudio BottiDepartment Breast Surgery (IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena-Roma, Italy), Roma, Italy.
Francesca PelliniOncology Department Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata (AOUI) Verona, Complex Operative Unit (UOC) Breast Surgery, Breast Unit, Verona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer is a global health problem, and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the standard procedure for early-stage breast cancer. Technetium-99 (TC-99), alone or combined with blue dye (BD) are conventional tracers for SLNB, but they have safety, availability, and cost limitations. Indocyanine green (ICG) is an alternative tracer that has been gaining acceptance among healthcare professionals. This study aimed at assessing the clinical and economic value of ICG in hospital settings, using the health technology assessment (HTA) framework.

methodsWe conducted a comprehensive evaluation of ICG for SLNB, based on literature sources and data collected from two Italian hospitals that switched from TC-99 to ICG. We analyzed ICG's technical attributes through technology documentation and relevant databases. We performed a systematic literature review of 36 studies to assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of ICG. We obtained organizational insights from clinicians and the clinical engineer involved in the study. We applied Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC) and Budget Impact Analysis (BIA) to estimate the economic impact of ICG. The ethical, legal, and social implications of ICG were considered through clinicians' inputs and technology documentation.

resultsOur results showed that ICG had equivalent or superior clinical effectiveness compared to TC-99 and BD, with minimal adverse events. ICG simplified the surgical pathways, by streamlining procedures, reducing waiting times, and increasing flexibility in scheduling surgeries. Moreover, the TDABC analysis showed significant cost reductions by avoiding the need for pre-operative lymphoscintigraphy and hospitalization, with average savings per single care pathway of around 18% for ICG compared to TC-99. Finally, ICG improved patient experience, and proved regulatory compliance.

conclusionsThis study provided strong evidence for ICG's clinical and economic value for SLNB in breast cancer. It ascertained ICG as a valuable alternative to conventional tracers, ensuring clinical effectiveness along with economic and organizational benefits.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsIndocyanine GreenSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyColoring AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansTechnetiumColoring AgentsIndocyanine GreenTechnetiumTechnetium-99

Identifiers

PMID39208241
PMCPMC11361597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.