ArticlePloS one2024
Comparative genomic landscape of lower-grade glioma and glioblastoma.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The Clinical Utility of Cell-Free DNA in Brain Tumor Management: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2025Review
- RadGLO: an interactive platform for radiomic feature analysis and prognostic modeling in glioma.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Genomic Profiling in Glioma Patients to Explore Clinically Relevant Markers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomarkers for classifying and grading gliomas have been extensively explored, whereas populations in public databases were mostly Western/European. Based on public databases cannot accurately represent Chinese population. To identify molecular characteristics associated with clinical outcomes of lower-grade glioma (LGG) and glioblastoma (GBM) in the Chinese population, we performed whole-exome sequencing (WES) in 16 LGG and 35 GBM tumor tissues. TP53 (36/51), TERT (31/51), ATRX (16/51), EFGLAM (14/51), and IDH1 (13/51) were the most common genes harboring mutations. IDH1 mutation (c.G395A; p.R132H) was significantly enriched in LGG, whereas PCDHGA10 mutation (c.A265G; p.I89V) in GBM. IDH1-wildtype and PCDHGA10 mutation were significantly related to poor prognosis. IDH1 is an important biomarker in gliomas, whereas PCDHGA10 mutation has not been reported to correlate with gliomas. Different copy number variations (CNVs) and oncogenic signaling pathways were identified between LGG and GBM. Differential genomic landscapes between LGG and GBM were revealed in the Chinese population, and PCDHGA10, for the first time, was identified as the prognostic factor of gliomas. Our results might provide a basis for molecular classification and identification of diagnostic biomarkers and even potential therapeutic targets for gliomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.