Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39208136›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2024

Sensorimotor functioning changes in response to global exercise versus handwriting upper limb exercise training in Parkinson's disease, results from a phase II randomised controlled trial.

Íbis Ariana Peña de Moraes, Johnny Collett, Talita Dias da Silva, Marloes Franssen, Surabhi Mitta, Paweł Zalewski, Andy Meaney, Derick Wade, Hooshang Izadi, Charlotte Winward and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01439022 (Longer-term Exercise Interventions in People With Parkinson's Disease), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01439022 phase2completednot on this map

Longer-term Exercise Interventions in People With Parkinson's Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorOxford Brookes UniversityRan2011 to 2014Enrolled105ConditionsParkinson's DiseaseArmsExercise Programme, Hand Writing programme
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Íbis Ariana Peña de MoraesNational Institute for Health and Care Research, Exeter Biomedical Research Centre, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Johnny CollettMovement Science Group, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Talita Dias da SilvaPostgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marloes FranssenMovement Science Group, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1134-7929
Surabhi MittaDepartment of Psychology, University of Buckingham, Buckingham, United Kingdom.
Paweł ZalewskiDepartment of Exercise Physiology and Functional Anatomy, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Andy MeaneyMovement Science Group, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Derick WadeMovement Science Group, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Hooshang IzadiMovement Science Group, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Charlotte WinwardMovement Science Group, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Carlos Bandeira de Mello MonteiroPostgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Helen DawesNational Institute for Health and Care Research, Exeter Biomedical Research Centre, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2933-5213

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeople with Parkinson's disease (PwPD) present motor alterations which can impact daily life tasks that require speed and/or accuracy of movement.

objectiveA sub analysis of NCT01439022, aiming to estimate the extent to which two different exercise training protocols (global and handwriting upper limb exercise training) impact reaction time, travel speed, and accuracy in PwPD.

methodsSeventy PwPD, right-side dominant were randomised 1:1 into two six-month training protocol groups; 35 PwPD performed global exercise training and 35 performed specific training (handwriting upper limb exercise movements). Assessments of speed-accuracy and trade-off were carried out at baseline, after 3 and 6 months of training, and at a 12-month follow-up. The current study used data from a previous publication of a randomised controlled trial that included a 6-month self-managed community exercise programme for PwPD. For the present study we included only the participants who completed the Fitts' task during the baseline assessment.

resultsIn the upper limb assessments, no main effects were found for the number of touches, but the exercise group showed a marginal increase over time on the left side. Error averages on the left side decreased significantly for the exercise group from baseline to 6 and 12 months. The exercise group also presented a lower Error CoV and the Reaction Time CoV increased on the right side. Significant findings for Fitts r on the left side indicated lower values for the exercise group, with improvements continuing at 12 months.

conclusionWe report the potential of global exercise interventions to facilitate improvements in reaction time and travel speed, as well as other motor control metrics, with lasting effects at 12 months, particularly on the non-dominant side.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyHandwritingParkinson DiseaseUpper ExtremityAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychomotor PerformanceReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID39208136
PMCPMC11361610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.