Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39208111›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2024

Aggregate-selective removal of pathological tau by clustering-activated degraders.

Jonathan Benn, Shi Cheng, Sophie Keeling, Annabel E Smith, Marina J Vaysburd, Dorothea Böken, Lauren V C Miller, Taxiarchis Katsinelos, Catarina Franco, Elian Dupré and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jonathan Benn *UK Dementia Research Institute at the University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0AH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1225-6682
Shi Cheng *UK Dementia Research Institute at the University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0AH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0092-564X
Sophie KeelingUK Dementia Research Institute at the University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0AH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6413-2550
Annabel E SmithUK Dementia Research Institute at the University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0AH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5837-6121
Marina J VaysburdMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK.
Dorothea BökenUK Dementia Research Institute at the University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0AH, UK.ORCID 0009-0008-8443-4469
Lauren V C MillerMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK.
Taxiarchis KatsinelosUK Dementia Research Institute at the University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0AH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6951-3216
Catarina FrancoMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK.
Elian DupréCNRS EMR9002-BSI-Integrative Structural Biology, LabEx DISTALZ, F-59000 Lille, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5281-0337
Clément DanisCNRS EMR9002-BSI-Integrative Structural Biology, LabEx DISTALZ, F-59000 Lille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5895-4742
Isabelle LandrieuCNRS EMR9002-BSI-Integrative Structural Biology, LabEx DISTALZ, F-59000 Lille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4883-2637
Luc BuéeUniversité Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, LabEx DISTALZ, F-59000 Lille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6261-4230
David KlenermanUK Dementia Research Institute at the University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0AH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7116-6954
Leo C JamesMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2131-0334
William A McEwanUK Dementia Research Institute at the University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0AH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4408-0407

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105181010Wellcome Trust 200594Wellcome Trust 206248Wellcome Trust 223054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selective degradation of pathological protein aggregates while sparing monomeric forms is of major therapeutic interest. The E3 ligase tripartite motif-containing protein 21 (TRIM21) degrades antibody-bound proteins in an assembly state-specific manner due to the requirement of TRIM21 RING domain clustering for activation, yet effective targeting of intracellular assemblies remains challenging. Here, we fused the RING domain of TRIM21 to a target-specific nanobody to create intracellularly expressed constructs capable of selectively degrading assembled proteins. We evaluated this approach against green fluorescent protein-tagged histone 2B (H2B-GFP) and tau, a protein that undergoes pathological aggregation in Alzheimer's and other neurodegenerative diseases. RING-nanobody degraders prevented or reversed tau aggregation in culture and in vivo, with minimal impact on monomeric tau. This approach may have therapeutic potential for the many disorders driven by intracellular protein aggregation.

Indexed as

Protein AggregatesProtein Aggregation, PathologicalProteolysisRibonucleoproteinstau ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesAlzheimer DiseaseAnimalsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHEK293 CellsHistonesHumansMiceSingle-Domain AntibodiesSS-A AntigenGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHistonesProtein AggregatesRibonucleoproteinsSingle-Domain AntibodiesSS-A Antigentau ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID39208111
PMCPMC7616837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.