Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39208082›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2024

Phage-triggered reverse transcription assembles a toxic repetitive gene from a noncoding RNA.

Max E Wilkinson, David Li, Alex Gao, Rhiannon K Macrae, Feng Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Max E WilkinsonHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4738-9503
David LiDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8921-5168
Alex GaoDepartment of Biochemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3579-0327
Rhiannon K MacraeHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7850-9056
Feng ZhangHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0178-7995

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reverse transcription has frequently been co-opted for cellular functions and in prokaryotes is associated with protection against viral infection, but the underlying mechanisms of defense are generally unknown. Here, we show that in the DRT2 defense system, the reverse transcriptase binds a neighboring pseudoknotted noncoding RNA. Upon bacteriophage infection, a template region of this RNA is reverse transcribed into an array of tandem repeats that reconstitute a promoter and open reading frame, allowing expression of a toxic repetitive protein and an abortive infection response. Biochemical reconstitution of this activity and cryo-electron microscopy provide a molecular basis for repeat synthesis. Gene synthesis from a noncoding RNA is a previously unknown mode of genetic regulation in prokaryotes.

Indexed as

DNA, ComplementaryKlebsiella pneumoniaePromoter Regions, GeneticReverse TranscriptionRNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseRNA, UntranslatedSiphoviridaeCryoelectron MicroscopyEscherichia coliNucleic Acid ConformationOpen Reading FramesTandem Repeat SequencesDNA, ComplementaryRNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseRNA, Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID39208082
PMCPMC12039810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.