Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39208072›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Dramatic resurgence of malaria after 7 years of intensive vector control interventions in Eastern Uganda.

Moses R Kamya, Joaniter I Nankabirwa, Emmanuel Arinaitwe, John Rek, Maato Zedi, Catherine Maiteki-Sebuguzi, Jimmy Opigo, Sarah G Staedke, Ambrose Oruni, Martin J Donnelly and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. CXCR6bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Remoscope: a label-free imaging cytometer for malaria diagnostics.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Moses R KamyaInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9106-4234
Joaniter I NankabirwaInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7818-3845
Emmanuel ArinaitweInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9769-0348
John RekInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
Maato ZediInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
Catherine Maiteki-SebuguziInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
Jimmy OpigoNational Malaria Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Sarah G StaedkeDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2505-821X
Ambrose OruniDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Martin J DonnellyDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Bryan GreenhouseDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0287-9111
Jessica BriggsDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8078-3898
Paul J KrezanoskiDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5376-5336
Teun BousemaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Philip J RosenthalDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7953-7622
Peter OlwochInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
Prasanna JagannathanDivision of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6305-758X
Isabel Rodriguez-BarraquerDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Grant DorseyDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0740-0317

Funding

Transmission ProjectU19AI089674 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MATTHEW G DORSEY, MOSES Robert KAMYA · 2010 to 2026
$29.3M
Identifying gaps between LLIN use and vector exposure to improve malaria controlK23AI139364 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KREZANOSKI, PAUL JOSEPH · 2019 to 2023
$986k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI139364NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI089674
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tororo District, Uganda experienced a dramatic decrease in malaria burden from 2015-19 during 5 years of indoor residual spraying (IRS) with carbamate (Bendiocarb) and then organophosphate (Actellic) insecticides. However, a marked resurgence occurred in 2020, which coincided with a change to a clothianidin-based IRS formulations (Fludora Fusion/SumiShield). To quantify the magnitude of the resurgence, investigate causes, and evaluate the impact of a shift back to IRS with Actellic in 2023, we assessed changes in malaria metrics in regions within and near Tororo District. Malaria surveillance data from Nagongera Health Center, Tororo District was included from 2011-2023. In addition, a cohort of 667 residents from 84 houses was followed from August 2020 through September 2023 from an area bordering Tororo and neighboring Busia District, where IRS has never been implemented. Cohort participants underwent passive surveillance for clinical malaria and active surveillance for parasitemia every 28 days. Mosquitoes were collected in cohort households every 2 weeks using CDC light traps. Female Anopheles were speciated and tested for sporozoites and phenotypic insecticide resistance. Temporal comparisons of malaria metrics were stratified by geographic regions. At Nagongera Health Center average monthly malaria cases varied from 419 prior to implementation of IRS; to 56 after 5 years of IRS with Bendiocarb and Actellic; to 1591 after the change in IRS to Fludora Fusion/SumiShield; to 155 after a change back to Actellic. Among cohort participants living away from the border in Tororo, malaria incidence increased over 8-fold (0.36 vs. 2.97 episodes per person year, p<0.0001) and parasite prevalence increased over 4-fold (17% vs. 70%, p<0.0001) from 2021 to 2022 when Fludora Fusion/SumiShield was used. Incidence decreased almost 5-fold (2.97 vs. 0.70, p<0.0001) and prevalence decreased by 39% (70% vs. 43%, p<0.0001) after shifting back to Actellic. There was a similar pattern among those living near the border in Tororo, with increased incidence between 2021 and 2022 (0.93 vs. 2.40, p<0.0001) followed by a decrease after the change to Actellic (2.40 vs. 1.33, p<0.001). Among residents of Busia, malaria incidence did not change significantly over the 3 years of observation. Malaria resurgence in Tororo was temporally correlated with the replacement of An. gambiae s.s. by An. funestus as the primary vector, with a marked decrease in the density of An. funestus following the shift back to IRS with Actellic. In Busia, An. gambiae s.s. remained the primary vector throughout the observation period. Sporozoite rates were approximately 50% higher among An. funestus compared to the other common malaria vectors. Insecticide resistance phenotyping of An. funestus revealed high tolerance to clothianidin, but full susceptibility to Actellic. A dramatic resurgence of malaria in Tororo was temporally associated with a change to clothianidin-based IRS formulations and emergence of An. funestus as the predominant vector. Malaria decreased after a shift back to IRS with Actellic. This study highlights the ability of malaria vectors to rapidly circumvent control efforts and the importance of high-quality surveillance systems to assess the impact of malaria control interventions and generate timely, actionable data.

Identifiers

PMID39208072
PMCPMC11361418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.