Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39208013›Full record

ArticleOptics letters2024

Sample tilting for speckle suppression through angular compounding.

Bhaskara Rao Chintada, Pelham Keahey, Néstor Uribe-Patarroyo, Brett E Bouma, Martin Villiger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Optics letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bhaskara Rao Chintada
Pelham Keahey
Néstor Uribe-Patarroyo
Brett E Bouma
Martin Villiger

Funding

TRD3: Percutaneous and Interstitial ImagingP41EB015903 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Jacqueline Namati · 2012 to 2026
$22.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speckle degrades the quality of optical coherence tomography (OCT) images and impedes their visual interpretation. Current hardware methods for speckle suppression necessitate difficult hardware modifications. As a result, algorithmic approaches for speckle suppression generally lack validation or training with physically meaningful ground truth. Here, we demonstrate angular compounding through tilting of the sample with a motorized rotation stage. Tomograms acquired at different tilt angles are related to each other through a physics-informed affine map, which can be retrieved directly from the measurement data. Using a mechanical sample tilting stage obviates the need to alter the OCT hardware and enables effective angular compounding with existing OCT instruments.

Identifiers

PMID39208013
PMCPMC11827440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.