ArticleEndocrinology, diabetes & metabolism2024
Utility of Adrenal Vein Sampling With and Without Ultra-Low Dose ACTH Infusion in the Diagnostic Evaluation of Primary Aldosteronism.
Article in Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07298954 (Sequential Combined Versus Single-Strategy Adrenal Venous Sampling for Primary Aldosteronism), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Sequential Combined Versus Single-Strategy Adrenal Venous Sampling for Primary Aldosteronism: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Ten Year Overview of Adrenal Vein Sampling in Croatia: Insights and Outcomes.Clinical endocrinology · 2026Article
- Optimizing the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism: The role of adrenal vein sampling and the need for high-expertise reference centers.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2026Observational
- Subtyping of Primary Aldosteronism by Adrenal Venous Sampling.Endocrine reviews · 2025Review
- Accuracy of semi-quantitative gold nanoparticle-based quick cortisol assay with and without adrenocorticotropic hormone infusion during adrenal vein sampling.Journal of human hypertension · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdrenal vein sampling (AVS), integral to identifying surgically remediable unilateral primary aldosteronism (PA), is technically challenging and subject to fluctuations in cortisol and aldosterone secretion. Intra-procedural adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), conventionally administered as a 250-μg bolus and/or 50 μg per hour infusion, increases cortisol and aldosterone secretion and can improve AVS success, but may cause discordant lateralisation compared to unstimulated AVS.
aimsTo assess if AVS performed with ultra-low dose ACTH infusion causes discordant lateralisation.
methodsHere, we describe our preliminary experience using an ultra-low dose ACTH infusion AVS protocol. We retrospectively reviewed the results of consecutive AVS procedures (n = 37) performed with and without ultra-low dose ACTH (1-μg bolus followed by 1.25 μg per hour infusion).
resultsBilateral AV cannulation was successful in 70% of procedures pre-ACTH and 89% post-ACTH (p < 0.01). Sixty-nine percent of studies lateralised pre-ACTH and 55% post-ACTH, improving to 79% when both groups were combined. Lateralisation was discordant in 11 cases, including eight in which lateralisation was present only on basal sampling, and three in which lateralisation occurred only with ACTH stimulation. DISCUSSION: Overall, the decrease in lateralisation rates with ACTH was higher than previously reported for some protocols utilising conventional doses of ACTH. Our results suggest that AVS performed with ultra-low dose ACTH can cause discordant lateralisation similar to AVS performed with conventional doses of ACTH.
conclusionProspective studies directly comparing low and conventional dose ACTH AVS protocols and long-term patient outcomes are needed to help define the optimal ACTH dose for accurate PA subtyping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.