Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39207753›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Hormone Therapy and Biological Aging in Postmenopausal Women.

Yufan Liu, Chenglong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. International journal of molecular medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The benefits of testosterone therapy for menopausal symptoms.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The special extract ERr 731Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Quantification of Epigenetic Aging in Public Health.Annual review of public health · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yufan LiuCapital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Chenglong LiNational Institute of Health Data Science at Peking University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Menopause is associated with biological aging, and hormone therapy (HT) is associated with health outcomes in postmenopausal women. Objective: To evaluate the association between HT use and discrepancies between chronological and biological age in postmenopausal women as well as the potential modifying role of socioeconomic status (SES). Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based, retrospective cohort study included postmenopausal women registered in the UK Biobank. A baseline survey on HT use and biological aging biomarkers was conducted from March 2006 to October 2010. Data analyses were conducted in December 2023. Exposures: Information regarding HT use, the age at starting HT, and HT duration was collected via a touchscreen questionnaire. SES was evaluated by education, family income, occupation, and the Townsend Deprivation Index. Main Outcomes and Measures: Biological aging discrepancy was evaluated using validated phenotypic age, which was calculated using chronological age and 9 biomarkers measured at baseline. All-cause and cause-specific mortality were also assessed. Results: Among the 117 763 postmenopausal women (mean [SD] age, 60.2 [5.4] years), 47 461 (40.3%) ever used HT. The mean phenotypic age was 52.1 (7.9) years. Ever use of HT was associated with a smaller biological aging discrepancy than never use of HT (β, -0.17 years; 95% CI, -0.23 to -0.10 years). This smaller aging discrepancy was more evident in those who started HT at age 55 years or older (β, -0.32 years; 95% CI, -0.48 to -0.15 years) and in those who used HT for 4 to 8 years (β, -0.25 years; 95% CI, -0.35 to -0.15 years). The association between HT and a smaller aging discrepancy was more evident in women with low SES, with a significant interaction observed for education (higher education: β, -0.08 years [95% CI, -0.17 to 0.01]; other education: β, -0.23 [95% CI, -0.32 to -0.14] years; P for interaction = .02). Phenotypic aging discrepancy mediated 12.7% (95% CI, 6.3% to 23.9%) of the association between HT and all-cause mortality and cause-specific mortality. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, postmenopausal women with historical HT use were biologically younger than those not receiving HT, with a more evident association observed in those with low SES. The biological aging discrepancy mediated the association between HT and decreased mortality. Promoting HT in postmenopausal women could be important for healthy aging.

Indexed as

AgingPostmenopauseAgedBiomarkersEstrogen Replacement TherapyFemaleHormone Replacement TherapyHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited KingdomBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID39207753
PMCPMC11362863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.