Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39207669›Full record

ArticleAmbio2024

Modeling fisheries and carbon sequestration ecosystem services under deep uncertainty in the ocean twilight zone.

Maartje Oostdijk, Laura G Elsler, Julie Van Deelen, Willem L Auping, Jan Kwakkel, Amanda Schadeberg, Berthe M J Vastenhoud, Claudiu Eduard Nedelciu, Fabio Berzaghi, Raul Prellezo and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maartje OostdijkFaculty of Agricultural Sciences, Agricultural University of Iceland, Keldnaholt, Árleynir 22, 112, Reykjavík, Iceland. maartjeoostdijk@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8995-9597
Laura G ElslerHarvard. T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Julie Van DeelenPolicy Analysis Section, Department of Multi-Actor Systems, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, 2628 BX, Delft, The Netherlands.
Willem L AupingPolicy Analysis Section, Department of Multi-Actor Systems, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, 2628 BX, Delft, The Netherlands. W.L.Auping@tudelft.nl.
Jan KwakkelPolicy Analysis Section, Department of Multi-Actor Systems, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, 2628 BX, Delft, The Netherlands.
Amanda SchadebergEnvironmental Economics and Natural Resources Group, Wageningen University, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Berthe M J VastenhoudNational Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark, Kemitorvet 201, 2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Claudiu Eduard NedelciuDepartment of Geography, System Dynamics Group, University of Bergen, Fosswinckelsgate 6, 5007, Bergen, Norway.
Fabio BerzaghiOcean Sustainability, Governance and Management, World Maritime University, Fiskehamnsgatan 1, 211 18, Malmö, Sweden.
Raul PrellezoAZTI. Marine Research Unit. Txatxarramendi Ugartea Z/G, 48395, Txatxarramendi, Sukarrieta, Spain.
Mary S WiszScience Institute, University of Iceland, Saemundargata 2, 101, Reykjavik, Iceland.

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 817669Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 817806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesopelagic fishes are a vital component of the biological carbon pump and are, to date, largely unexploited. In recent years, there has been an increased interest in harvesting the mesopelagic zone to produce fish feed for aquaculture. However, great uncertainties exist in how the mesopelagic zone interacts with the climate and food webs, presenting a dilemma for policy. Here, we investigate the consequences of potential policies relating to mesopelagic harvest quotas with a dynamic social-ecological modeling approach, combining system dynamics and global sensitivity analyses informed by participatory modeling. Our analyses reveal that, in simulations of mesopelagic fishing scenarios, uncertainties about mesopelagic fish population dynamics have the most pronounced influence on potential outcomes. The analysis also shows that prioritizing the development of the fishing industry over environmental protection would lead to a significantly higher social cost of climate change to society. Given the large uncertainties and the potential large impacts on oceanic carbon sequestration, a precautionary approach to developing mesopelagic fisheries is warranted.

Indexed as

Carbon SequestrationClimate ChangeEcosystemFisheriesOceans and SeasAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesFishesFood ChainModels, TheoreticalPopulation DynamicsUncertaintyBlue carbonCarbon sequestrationDeep uncertaintyMesopelagic fisherySocial-ecological modeling

Identifiers

PMID39207669
PMCPMC11436683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.