Trial reportNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2025
Methylene blue for COVID-19 ARDS: insights from a randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAround the world, the COVID-19 pandemic has presented many difficulties, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has become a major worry. The antiviral and anti-inflammatory characteristics of methylene blue (MB) have garnered interest for potential medicinal applications. The object of the current study is to assess the effect of orally administered MB on the treatment of ARDS associated with COVID-19.
methodA randomized clinical study was carried out on 122 hospitalized patients who had ARDS related to COVID-19. Patients who met the eligibility requirements were randomized at random to either the control group (CG) (n = 60) or the intervention group (IG) (n = 62). Standard treatments were administered to both groups, with the addition of oral MB to the IG. Clinical outcomes, including SpO2 levels, CRP levels were assessed on the third and fifth days. Additionally, at the time of discharge, patients' assessments were made in terms of APACHE II scores, SOFA scores, LDH and CRP levels, SpO2, and respiratory rate in comparison to the day prior to the intervention. Patients were followed for mortality outcomes at one month and three months after the intervention.
resultsSignificant changes were observed in SpO2 levels over time (P < 0.001) and between groups (P = 0.022), with higher levels in the MB-treated group. The interaction between time and group (P = 0.019) indicated a stronger increase in SpO2 in the IG, with the IG's SpO2 level increasing by 6.42%. Furthermore, CRP levels showed significant changes over time (P < 0.001), but not between groups (P = 0.092). However, the interaction between group and CRP change over time (P = 0.019) suggested a distinct pattern of CRP decrease in the IG. Significant improvement in RR, SpO2, CRP, and APACHE II score were found according to discharge results. However, in terms of SpO2 and the APACHE II score, this improvement was noteworthy for IG. The length of hospitalization and mortality rates at one- and three-month follow-ups did not differ significantly.
conclusionOral administration of MB demonstrated positive effects on improving SpO2 levels and reducing inflammatory markers in COVID-19-related ARDS patients. Despite no significant impact on survival rates or hospitalization length, the study supports the potential efficacy of MB as an alternative treatment for COVID-19 ARDS.
trial registrationThis study was registered with the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials ( http://www.irct.ir ) under the registration code IRCT20200409047007N2 on 11/29/2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39207597What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.